- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 22 December 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 30984/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶2The respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the respondent to pass order one way or the other. Interested persons shall be put on notice before passing the order.
¶3The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
22.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To The Tahsildar, Thirupathur Taluk, Sivagangai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
22.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.V.Dinakaran ... Petitioner Vs. The Tahsildar, Thirupathur Taluk, Sivagangai District. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to direct the respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 29.11.2023 for grant of house site patta within the time fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Anandkumar For Responden : Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.