VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

S.V.Udayakumar v. State of Tamilnadu

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 November 2025
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor, B.Pugalendhi
Case no.
WP(MD) 33350/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow G.R.SwaminathanFollow B.Pugalendhi

Judgment

O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the official 3 W.P.(MD)NO.33350 OF 2025 respondents and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent.

¶2Issuance of notice to the fifth respondent is dispensed with.

¶3The petitioner is a resident of Nagercoil. According to him, the water channel known as Ananthar channel has been encroached upon. He wants the same to be removed.

¶4The officials of PWD have stated that the Tahsildar, Agastheeswaram Taluk will conduct survey and identify the encroachments. The fourth respondent is directed to issue notice to all the interested persons including the alleged encroachers and conduct survey thereafter. If the survey results indicate that there are encroachments in Ananthar channel, the same will have to be removed by adhering to due process of law. It is reiterated that notices will be issued to all the interested persons including the alleged encroachers. They shall be provided an opportunity of hearing. Even after conducting survey, if the authorities comes to the conclusion that the encroachments are confirmed, the same will be 4 W.P.(MD)NO.33350 OF 2025 removed. The entire exercise will be completed within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs. (G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) & (B.PUGALENDHI, J.) 20th November 2025

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU To:

¶1The District Collector of Kanyakumari District, District Collectorate, Nagercoil.

¶2The Executive Engineer, PWD-Water Resource Department, Kothaiyar Basin Division, Veppammoodu Junction, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

¶3The Tahsildar, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District. 5 W.P.(MD)NO.33350 OF 2025

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND

B.PUGALENDHI, J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.33350 of 2025

20.11.2025 6 W.P.(MD)NO.33350 OF 2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

1 W.P.(MD)NO.33350 OF 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P.(MD)No.33350 of 2025 S.V.Udayakumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its District Collector of Kanyakumari District, District Collectorate, Nagercoil. 2. The Commissioner, Nagercoil Municipal Corporation, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 3. The Executive Engineer, PWD-Water Resource Department, Kothaiyar Basin Division, Veppammoodu Junction, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 4. The Tahsildar, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District. 5. Dr.Shyam Mukerjee Memorial Trust, Regn No.98/1994, Rep. by its Trustee R.Iyyappan, S/o.Ramachandran, Parvathipuram Junction, 2 W.P.(MD)NO.33350 OF 2025 Vettoornimadam Post, Parvathipuram. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 to 4 to initiate appropriate and suitable action so as to remove all encroachments on both sides of the ' Ananthar Channel' at Parvathipuram Junction, inclusive of the encroachments made by the fifth respondent adjacent to "Arulmigu Karpaga Vinayagar temple", situate at Parvathipuram Junction, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 27.06.2025 within a time frame as fixed by this Court and further direct the first respondent to ensure free flow of traffic on both sides of 'Ananthar channel' without any hindrance to public, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Aravinthan, for M/s.Aran Legal Consultancy. For Respondents : Mr.R.Ragavendran, Government Advocate for R-1,R-3&R-4. Mr.F.Deepak for R-2. * * *

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.