VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M.Kaleeswari v. L.Muniyandi

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 January 2026
Bench
Mohammed Shaffiqauthor
Case no.
TR CMP(MD) 709/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Mohammed Shaffiq

Judgment

ORDER This Transfer Petition invoking Section 24 of C.P.C is filed at the instance of wife. She seeks withdrawal of H.M.O.P.No.206 of 2025 from the file of 3rd Additional Sub Court, Madurai District and transfer the same to the Sub Court, Palani.

¶2Heard Mr.S.Lawrence Vimal Raj, learned counsel for petitioner.

¶3The marriage between petitioner and 1st respondent was solemnized on 03.11.2019 at Thangam Mahal, Pappampatti, Palani Dindigul District, as per Hindu rites and customs. Out of wedlock, a male child was born on 19.08.2022. Due to differences, parties have separated. While so, respondent/husband initiated proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.206 of 2025 for divorce before 3rd Additional Sub Court, Madurai. Pleading that wife is residing in Dindigul and unable to travel from Dindigul to Madurai, she has moved this transfer petition.

¶4Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that petitioner is residing with her aged parents at Palani, Dindigul District and she may have to travel about 250 Kms, for every hearing at 3rd Additional Sub Court, Madurai; and that she has no source of income and thus, she may not be in a position to bear the travel expenditure. He would further submit that her son is only 3 years old and further she has apprehensions travelling to Madurai.

¶5That apart, he would submit that though notice has been served on respondent, none appeared on behalf of respondent today as well as on the earlier occasion.

¶6It is relevant to note that Parliament, while amending the Hindu Marriage Act, has incorporated Section 19(iii), permitting a wife to initiate a proceeding in a place where she is residing. This is an indication that convenience of the wife has to be given precedence by the Court. In line with this Parliamentary amendment, this Court and the Supreme Court have consistently held in matters of transfer, convenience of wife should be given a superior consideration than that of husband. As the distance between Palani and Madurai is considerable and since it will be difficult for the wife to travel for attending the Court, I am inclined to allow the petition seeking transfer as prayed for.

¶7In view thereof, H.M.O.P.No.206 of 2025 pending on the file of 3rd Additional Sub Court, Madurai is hereby ordered to be withdrawn and transferred to the file of Sub Court, Palani. The Sub Court, Palani, is directed to dispose of the aforementioned case expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months.

¶8With the above observations, the Transfer Petition is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

27.01.2026 rgm To:

¶1The Sub Court, Palani.

¶2The 3rd Additional Sub Court, Madurai.

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. Madurai.

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. rgm and CMP.(MD)No.19939 of 2025 Dated: 27.01.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ and CMP.(MD)No.19939 of 2025 M.Kaleeswari ... Petitioner Vs. 1. L.Muniyandi 2. G.Shankar ... Respondents PRAYER Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under section 24 of Civil Procedure Code to pass orders to withdraw the case on the file of the Hon'ble 3rd Additional Sub Court, Madurai District in HMOP.No.206 of 2025 and transfer the same to the Hon'ble Sub Court, Palani. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Lawrence Vimal Raj For Respondents : No Appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.