VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Subramani v. The State of Tamil Nadu

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 April 2026
Bench
N. Anand Venkateshauthor, K.K. Ramakrishnan
Case no.
HCP(MD) 1460/2025

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by N. ANAND VENKATESH,J.) The petitioner is the husband of the detenue, by name, Selvi, w/o Subramani, female, aged about 58 years. The detenue has been detained by the second respondent by his order in Cr.M.P.No.102 of 2025 dated

11.11.2025 holding her to be a "Drug Offender", as contemplated under Section 2(e) of the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. The said order is under challenge in this Habeas Corpus Petition.

¶2We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. We have also perused the records produced by the Detaining Authority.

¶3Though several grounds have been raised in the Habeas Corpus Petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would mainly focus his argument on the ground that there is no adverse case against the detenue. The ground case involved 2.200 kgs of ganja, which is also an intermediate quantity, for which, FIR was registered in Crime No.286 of 2025. The detenue was arrested on 13.10.2025, whereas, the detention order was passed only on 11.11.2025.

¶4It was contended that only the intermediate quantity was involved, whereas the Detaining Authority in a casual manner has passed the detention order in a case where such an order is not warranted.

¶5We are of the view that the quantity that is alleged to have been seized is only an intermediate quantity. Hence, it is not a serious offence under the NDPS Act, since it does not involve any commercial quantity, warranting passing of a detention order and the detenu could have been dealt with under regular penal law that is already available and there was no need for resorting to detention order under Act 14 of 1982.

¶6For this purpose, we rely on the judgment in Rekha vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2011 (5) SCC 244).

¶7In the result, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the order of detention in Cr.M.P.No.102 of 2025 dated 11.11.2025 passed by the second respondent is set aside. The detenue, viz., Selvi, w/o Subramani, female, aged about 58 years, is directed to be released forthwith unless her detention is required in connection with any other case.

(N.A.V.,J..) (K.K.R.K.,J.,)

16.04.2026 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No TSG To

1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Trichirappalli District, Trichirappalli.

3.The Superintendent of Prison, Special Prison for Women, Tiruchirapppalli.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

N. ANAND VENKATESH,J. AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN,J.

TSG

H.C.P.(MD)No.1460 of 2025

16.04.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.04.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN H.C.P.(MD)No.1460 of 2025 Subramani .. Petitioner / Husband of the detenu Vs. 1.The State of Tamil, represented by the Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Trichirappalli District, Trichirappalli. 3.The Superintendent of Prison, Special Prison for Women, Tiruchirapppalli. .. Respondents Prayer :Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the entire records connected with the detention order passed by the second respondent made in his proceedings in Cr.M.P.No.102 of 2025 dated 11.11.2025 in detaining the detenue under Section 2(e) of the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 as a "Drug Offender" and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu, namely Selvi, w/o Subramani, female, aged about 58 years, who is detained in Special Prison for Women, Tiruchirappalli, before this Court and set her at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.K.M.Karunakaran For Respondents : Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.