- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 April 2023
- Bench
- P. Velmurugan
- Case no.
- SA 451/2001
Judgment
JUDGMENT The appeal was listed on 25.04.2023. On that day there was no representation for the appellants. Therefore, the appeal was directed to be listed today (28.04.2023) under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today also there is no representation for the appellants. Hence, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No cost.
28.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No am To
1.The Sub-Court, Kuzhithurai.
2.The Principal District Munsif Court, Kuzhithurai.
3.The Record Keeper, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P.VELMURUGAN
, J.
am
28.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN 1.Sarasam (Died) 2.Anlin Rose 3.Anitha Radhakrishnan 4.Tamil Arasi 5.Tamizhithazh 6.Tamil Kani Bhaskar ....Appellants (A2 to A6 are bring on record as legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant as per order dated 04.10.2018) -Vs- 1.Singarayan 2.Vimala (Died) (Memo USR.6121/2018 recorded as per order dated 02.01.2019) ....Respondents PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.85 of 1996, on the file of the Sub- Court, Kuzhithurai dated 11.10.2000 confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.283 of 1984 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Kuzhithurai, dated 24.04.1996. For Appellants : No appearance For R1 : Mr.T.R.Rajaraman
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.