N.R.Sesha Iyengar v. V.Rajamani, S/O Veera

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.A.Nos.56 & 57 of 2001 & 1507 of 2000 S.A.No.56 of 2001

2.Vijaya Raghavan

5.Vedavalli (Appellants represented by their Power of Attorney, the first appellant)

1.V.Rajamani

3.V.Sampath Kumar Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.09.1999 in A.S.No. 55 of 1998 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Palani reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 23.06.1998 in O.S.No.185 of 1992 on the file of the District Munsif, Palani. : for Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai : S.A.No.57 of 2001

2.Vijaya Raghavan

5.Vedavalli Ranganathan (1st appellant for himself and as Power of Attorney of appellants 2 to 5)

1.V.Rajamani

3.V.Sampath Kumar Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.09.1999 in Cross Appeal in A.S.No.54 of 1998 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Palani confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 23.06.1998 insofar as portion of the claim in O.S.No.142 of 1992 on the file of the District Munsif, Palani. : for Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai : S.A.No.1507 of 2000

1.N.V.Rajamani

3.Sampath Kumar

2.U.G.Vijayaraghavan

5.Vedavalli Renganathan Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.09.1999 in A.S.No. 54 of 1998 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Palani confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 23.06.1998 in O.S.No.142 of 1992 on the file of the District Munsif, Palani. : : for Mr.J.Antony Jesus COMMON JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants in S.A.Nos.56 & 57 of 2001 reported 'no instructions'. The appellants in S.A.Nos.56 & 57 of 2001 are the respondents in SA.No.1507 of 2000.

¶2For the past five hearings, there is no representation for the appellants in SA.No.1507 of 2000. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of them. The appellants in S.A.No.1507 of 2000 are the respondents in SA.Nos.56 & 57 of 2001.

¶3The dispute in the instant case is with regard to a Will. Considering the above facts, there is a possibility that the matters might be amicably settled between the parties, that is the reason why, they are not interested to prosecute the appeals and failed to give appropriate instructions to the counsel. In view of the same, these Second Appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

18.08.2023 (2/2) NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To

1.The Subordinate Judge, Palani.

2.The District Munsif, Palani.

3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. S.A.Nos.56o&o57oofo2001oando1507oofo2000 oKRISHNANoRAMASAMYoo,oJo. mbi ooooooooooooooooo S.A.Nos.56o&o57oofo2001 &o1507oofo2000

18.08.2023 (2/2)oooo Pageo6oofo6