- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 8 June 2023
- Bench
- P. Velmurugan
- Case no.
- SA 1836/2001
Judgment
JUDGMENT When the matter was taken up for hearing on 01.06.2023, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants has filed a Memo dated
01.06.2023 reporting no instructions and stating that the letter sent to the first appellant returned as 'deceased'. The Registry was directed to print the name of the second appellant in the cause list.
¶2Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, though the name of the second appellant is printed in the cause list, there is no representation on his side. Further, no steps have been taken to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased first appellant. Therefore, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated as against the first appellant and dismissed for non-prosecution as against the second appellant. No costs.
08.06.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To
1.The Sub Court, Thanjore.
2.The District Munsif Court, Thiruvaiyaru. P.VELMURUGAN
, J.
mbi
08.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN 1.P.Saminathan 2.Samudhiram ...Appellants vs. 1.Rengan alias Rengasamy 2.Special Tahsildar, ADW, Thiruvaiyaru. ... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 07.09.2000 in A.S.No.3 of 2000 on the file of the Sub Judge, Thanjore reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 19.08.1998 in O.S.No.140 of 1997 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Thiruvaiyaru. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.