- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 1 June 2023
- Bench
- P. Velmurugan
- Case no.
- SA 2016/2001
Judgment
JUDGMENT When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the appellant. From the cause list, it reveals that the sole respondent died. In the Memo dated 27.02.2019 filed by the learned counsel for the respondent, it has been stated that the sole respondent died on 02.11.2007. However, so far no steps have been taken to implead the legal representatives of the deceased sole respondent. Therefore, this Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs.
01.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No SSB To
1.The Principal Subordinate Court, Thirunelveli,
2.The Additional District Munsif, Thirunelveli.
3.The Record Keeper, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P.VELMURUGAN
, J.
SSB
01.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:01.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Arulmigu Thirupani Vinayagar Koil, through its fit person, Executive Officer, Pillaian Kattalai, Thirunelveli Town ...Appellant -Vs- C.Athiappan ...Respondent PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.68 of 1993 dated 21.07.1998 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Thirunelveli, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.84 of 1987 dated 31.01.1992 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Thirunelveli. For Appellant : No-appearance For Respondent : Mr.K.Govindarajan for M/s.Sarvabhuman Associates
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.