- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 July 2023
- Bench
- P. Velmurugan
- Case no.
- SA 1488/2001
Judgment
J U D G M E N T It is seen from the records that the first respondent died on
14.08.2007. The appellants have filed the petitions to condone the delay of 376 days in filing the petitioner to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the first respondent, set aside abatement and to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent. Pending applications, all the respondents died. Therefore, the second appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No
04.07.2023 am To
1.The Sub-Court, Tuticorin.
2.The District Munsif, Tuticorin.
¶3The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
P.VELMURUGAN, J. am
04.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN 1.Smt.Allah Pitchai Beevi 2.Smt.Saseena Beevi ... Appellants Vs. 1.Nagore Pitchai Marakkayar 2.Sayad Marakkayar 3.Mohideen Pitchai 4.Meera Saheb ...Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree, dated 09.03.1999 passed by the Sub-Court, Tuticorin in A.S.No.196 of 1996 confirming the judgment and decree, dated 09.08.1996 passed by the District Munsif, Tuticorin in O.S.No.558 of 1994. For Appellants : Mr.S.Ramesh For Respondents : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.