- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 2 August 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA 117/2002
Judgment
J U D G M E N T The sole respondent died. However, till date no steps have been taken to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole respondent. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.
02.08.2023 akv To
1.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Keeranur.
2.The Principal District Judge, Pudukottai.
3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
,J.
akv
02.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY 1.Tmt.Pappammal 2.Tmt.Sundarambal 3.Tmt.Senpagavalli 4.Thiru.Poovalingam ... Appellants Vs. Ramasamy Chettiar ... Respondent PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 11.10.1999 in O.S.No.710 of 1995 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Keeranur reversing the judgment and decree dated 19.06.2000 in A.S.No.174 of 1999 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Pudukottai. For Appellants : Mr.V.R.Shanmuganathan For Respondent : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.