S.Alagirisamy v. Jeya Ammal

JUDGMENT The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the sole appellant passed away long before.

¶2Though the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the sole appellant died long before, till date, he has not taken any steps to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.

01.08.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To

1.The Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli

2.The Principal District Munsif, Tirunelveli.

3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

, J.

mbi

01.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.Alagirisamy ...Appellant vs. Jeya Ammal ... Respondent Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 22.03.2002 in A.S.No. 236 of 2001 on the file of the Principal District Court, Tirunelveli confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 04.07.2001 in O.S.No.133 of 1997 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli. For Appellant : Mr.J.Antony Jesus For Respondent : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai