M.Kasthuri v. Arulmighu Swaminatha Swami

J U D G M E N T When the second appeal is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation on the side of the appellant. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent is present. The second appeal is pending from the year 2002 and despite sufficient opportunity was given to the appellant, she is not ready to proceed with the appeal.

2.In view of the above, this Second appeal is dismissed for default with cost of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lakh only) to be paid before the Registry (Judicial). In case, the appellant files an application for restoration, the Registry shall not take the application for restoration on file, unless she deposits the cost of Rs.1,00,000/-.

13.04.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Ns To

1.The Subordinate Court, Kumbakonam.

2.The District Munsif, Kumbakonam.

¶3The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P.VELMURUGAN

,J.

Ns S.A.No.1907 of 2002

13.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN S.A.No.1907 of 2002 M.Kasthuri .... Pltff/Applnt/Appellant -Vs- Arulmighu Swaminatha Swami Devasthanam Samimalai, Represented by its Asst. Commissioner ...Defdt./Respt./Respondent PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 10.09.2001 passed in A.S.No. 168 of 2000 by the Subordinate Court, Kumbakonam, confirming the judgment and decree dated 09.08.1999 passed in O.S.No.241 of 1997 by the District Munsif, Kumbakonam. For Appellants : Mr.S.Sivathilagar (No appearance) For Respondents : Mr.T.Antony Arulraj