- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 10 July 2023
- Bench
- P. Velmurugan
- Case no.
- SA 1990/2002
Judgment
JUDGMENT M.P(MD)No.1 of 2009 is filed to condone the delay of 388 days in filing an application to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the sole respondent.
¶2Order of this Court dated 16.06.2023 has not been complied with. Affidavit of proof of service of private notice is also not filed. Therefore, M.P(MD)No.1 of 2009 is dismissed.
¶3Since M.P(MD)No.1 of 2009 is dismissed, automatically the Second Appeal would not survive and therefore, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed.
10.07.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To
1.The Additional District Sessions Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram
2.The District Munsif, Paramakudi.
3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P.VELMURUGAN
, J.
mbi
10.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN S.A.No.1990 of 2002 & M.P(MD)Nos.1 to 3 of 2009 Chellammal ...Appellant vs. Kuppu Thevar ... Respondent Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.08.2000 in A.S.No. 118 of 1998 on the file of the Additional District Sessions Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 16.07.1998 in O.S.No.351 of 1994 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Paramakudi. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.