- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 April 2023
- Bench
- P. Velmurugan
- Case no.
- SA 1936/2002
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal since the matter is already settled out of Court. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, the second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
13.04.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To
1.The Sub Court, Palani
2.The District Munsif Court, Palani P.VELMURUGAN
, J.
mbi
13.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Dharmaraj ...Appellant vs. 1.Nachammal 2.Subramaniya Gounder ... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree in A.S.No.26 of 1999 dated 18.04.2002 on the file of the Sub Court, Palani reversing the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.696 of 1993 dated 28.04.1999 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Palani. For Appellant : Mr.Anand Chandrasekaran for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates For Respondents : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.