- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 August 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA 1109/2003
Judgment
JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the issue in the instant appeal has been resolved amicably between the parties and the appellant has also sincerely paid the tax many times. Therefore, he would submit that nothing survives for further adjudication in the present appeal.
¶2Recording the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, this Second Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
18.08.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To
1.The Sub Judge, Srivilliputtur
2.The Principal District Munsif, Srivilliputtur
3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
, J.
mbi
18.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.A.No.1109 of 2003 & C.M.P.No.9663 of 2003 Nadar Uravinmurai Dharma Paribalana Sangam, Rep. by its President, K.S.V.Manickavasaga Nadar, Srivilliputhur. ...Appellant vs. Srivilliputhur Municipality, Rep. by its Commissioner. ... Respondent Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 20.01.2003 in A.S.No. 8 of 2002 on the file of the Sub Judge, Srivilliputtur confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 04.03.2002 in O.S.No.73 of 2000 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Srivilliputtur. For Appellant : Mr.D.Sathya Sri For Respondent : Mr.A.Baskaran, Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.