Thanjavur Municipality v. Mahalakshmi

THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.06.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and C.M.P.Nos.4738 to 4740 of 2004 S.A.No.1134 of 2003

...Defendant/1st Respondent/ Appellant

Vs Mahalakshmi

A.S.No.110 of 2001 and reversing the judgment and decree dated

17.08.2001 of the learned District Munsif of Thanjavur, in O.S.No.514 of S.A.No.1135 of 2003

...1st Defendant/1st Respondent/ Appellant

Vs

¶1Sankar

¶2Tamilnadu Electricity Board rep. By its Assistant Director, Thanjavur Town. ... 2nd Defendant/2nd Respondent/Respondent

A.S.No.113 of 2001 and reversing the judgment and decree dated

17.08.2001 of the learned District Munsif of Thanjavur, in O.S.No.516 of S.A.No.1136 of 2003

...1st Defendant/1st Respondent/ Appellant

Vs

¶1Chelliah

¶2Tamilnadu Electricity Board rep. By its Assistant Director, Thanjavur Town. ... 2nd Defendant/2nd Respondent/Respondent

A.S.No.114 of 2001 and reversing the judgment and decree dated

17.08.2001 of the learned District Munsif of Thanjavur, in O.S.No.513 of (In all cases) For Appellant : Mr.N.Dilipkumar

For M/S.T.M.Hariharan For respondents : No appearance COMMON JUDGMENT The Thanjavur Municipality represented by its Commissioner, is now the appellant in these three second appeals.

¶2The learned Counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo dated 07.06.2025, stating that the prayer sought for in the second appeals have become infructuous.

¶3A perusal of the records reveal that the lessees of shops outside the Thanjavur Big Temple had filed the suits seeking an injunction not to evict them before the lapse of the lease period and to restore electricity connections. The suits were dismissed by the Trial Court. However, the first appeals were allowed. Challenging the same, the present second appeals have been filed by the Thanjavur Municipality.

¶4According to the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant Municipality, the lessees have been removed from the said place and they have been provided with alternative site. Therefore, nothing survives in the second appeals.

¶5Recording the same, all the three second appeals are dismissed as infructuous. Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.N.Dilipkumar as the Standing Counsel for the appellant Municipality. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Index : Yes / No

09.06.2025 NCC : Yes / No jbr TO:

¶1The Principal District Judge, Thanjavur.

¶2The District Munsif Court, Thanjavur

¶3The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R. VIJAYAKUMAR

,J.

jbr Dated:

09.06.2025