- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 April 2023
- Bench
- P. Velmurugan
- Case no.
- SA 1098/2003
Judgment
JUDGMENT It is reported that the sole appellant died long back and thereafter, no steps have been taken to implead the legal heirs and to prosecute the appeal. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.
21.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No SSB To
¶1Subordinate Court, Padmanabhapuram
¶2Principal District Munsif, Padmanabhapuram
3.The Record Keeper, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P.VELMURUGAN
, J.
SSB
21.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:21.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Chellan ...3rd Defendant/Appellant/Appellant -Vs- 1.C.Packianathan 2.Christopher 3.P.C.Chandrasekharan 4.K.Krishnan 5.C.Ramesh 6.K.Thankaraj 7.A.S.Krishnan Kutti 8.V.Ramachandran Nair 9.V.Muraleedharan ...Respondents PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 30.04.2002 in A.S.No.101 of 1996 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Padmanabhapuram, confirming the judgment and decree of the Principal District Munsif, Padmanabhapuram made in O.S.No.581 of 1990 dated 18.02.1996. For Appellant : Mr.S.S.Mathivanan For Respondents : Mr.K.Sreekumaran Nair for R1 Mr.K.N.Thambi for R6 Mr.J.Anandahavalli for R7 No-appearance for RR2 to 5 and 8
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.