VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Vaithilingam Poosari v. Muthu Ambalam

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 April 2023
Bench
P. Velmuruganauthor
Case no.
SA 1145/2003

Judgment

ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing on 25.04.2023, there was no representation for the appellant. Therefore, it was ordered to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today.

¶2Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the appellant. The appeal is of the year 2003. Despite sufficient opportunity being given to the appellant, the appellant has not come forward to proceed with the appeal. Therefore, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution with cost of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) payable by the appellant to the Registry to the credit of S.A.No.1145 of 2003. In case the appellant files any application to restore the appeal, Registry is directed not to take the application on file unless the appellant deposits the cost imposed by this Court.

27.04.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To

1.The Additional District cum Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Pudukottai.

2.The Additional District Munsif Court, Pudukottai. P.VELMURUGAN

, J.

mbi

27.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Vaithilingam ...Appellant vs. Muthu Ambalam ... Respondent Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 31.03.1999 in A.S.No. 53 of 1998 on the file of the Additional District Judge cum Judicial Magistrate, Pudukottai confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 16.10.1996 in O.S.No.909 of 1992 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Pudukottai. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.D.Srinivasaragavan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.