A/M Swami Chidambareswarar and v. Vayana Perumal,

J U D G M E N T The sole respondent died. However, till date no steps have been taken to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole respondent. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.

02.08.2023 akv To

1.The Sub Court, Tuticorin.

2.The District Munsif Court, Trichendur.

3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

,J.

akv

02.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Arulmighu Swami Chidambareswarar and other Kovil Deity Sri Iyenduveedu Swami, Chettiapathu, through its Executive Officer, Trichendur Taluk, Tuticorin District. ... Appellant Vs. Vayana Perumal ... Respondent PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree of the Sub Court, Tuticorin in A.S.No.223 of 1997 dated 07.10.2002 confirming the judgment and decree of the District Munsif Court, Trichendur in O.S.No.293 of 1995, dated 10.03.1997. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.M.P.Senthil