- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 24 July 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA 1600/2003
Judgment
JUDGMENT When the matter was taken up for hearing on 20.07.2023, there was no representation for the appellants. Hence, it is listed today under the caption "for dismissal". Even today, there is no representation for the appellants. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
24.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes skn To:
1.The Additional Sub Judge, Dindigul.
2.The Additional District Munsif, Dindigul.
3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. skn
24.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 24.07.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY 1.M.Meiyappan 2.M.Vasantha ... Appellants -vs- M/s C.M.B Company rep. by its Proprietorix Tmt.C.M.Valliammal W/o Murugappan No.10, Race Course Road, Dindigul Town. ... Respondent PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 27.09.2000 made in A.S.No.59 of 1999 on the file of the Additional Sub Judge, Dindigul modifying the Judgment and Decree dated 16.11.1996 made in O.S.No. 858 of 1996 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Dindigul. For Appellants ... No appearance For Respondent ... Mr.M.P.Senthil
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.