- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 7 August 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA 1613/2003
Judgment
JUDGMENT It is stated by the learned counsel for the appellant that the sole respondent died very long back. Since no steps have been taken till date, the second appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
07.08.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes skn To:
1.The Principal District Judge, Tiruchirapalli
2.The Sub Judge, Tiruchirapalli
3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. skn and CMP No.14814 of 2003
07.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 07.08.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and CMP No.14814 of 2003 Jayaram College of Engineering and Technology rep by its Chairman M.Subramanian No.10, Maampazha Saalai, Srirangam, Tiruchirappalli. ... Appellant -vs- T.S.Santhanakrishnan ... Respondent PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 28.01.2003 made in A.S.No.35 of 2002 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tiruchirapalli modifying the Judgment and Decree dated 30.04.2001 made in O.S.No.389 of 1998 on the file of the Sub Judge, Tiruchirapalli. For Appellant ... Mr.T.M.Hariharan For Respondent ... No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.