- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 14 September 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA 1719/2003
Judgment
JUDGMENT When the matter was taken up for hearing on 12.09.2023, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, it is listed today under the caption "for dismissal". Even today, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
14.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes skn To:
1.The Principal Sub Judge, Madurai.
2.The District Munsif, Melur.
3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. skn
14.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 14.09.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY The Asst. Divl. Engineer, Highways Department, Melur ... Appellant -vs- 1.Sevuka Perumal 2.The Manager, The T.T.C. Motel Pallapatt. 3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Kottampatty (given up) ... Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 11.11.1998 made in A.S.No.102 of 1997 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Madurai confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 28.11.1996 made in O.S.No. 324 of 1995 on the file of the District Munsif, Melur. For Appellant ... No appearance For Respondents ... Mr.K.Mahendran for R1 R3 – given up
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.