Chandrasekara Thevar v. Mallika

J U D G M E N T When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the appellant has not turned up to provide any instruction and hence, he reported no instruction. It appears that the appellant has no interest in prosecuting the case. Therefore, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

12.09.2023 akv To

1.The Subordinate Judge, Arupukottai.

2.The District Munsif, Aruppukottai.

3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

,J.

akv

12.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Chandrasekara Thevar ... Appellant Vs. 1.Mallika 2.Periasamy Thevar 3.Chella Nachiar 4.Duraiswamy Thevar 5.Marakadham 6.The State of Tamil Nadu through its District Collector, Kamarajar District, Virudhunagar District. 7.The Tahsildar, Tiruchli Taluk, Tiruchuli. 8.The Block Development Officer, M.Reddiapatti. 9.The Divisional Development Officer, M.Reddiapatti. 10.The Assistant Development Officer, Aruppukottai. 11.Rajasekaran 12.Ganesan ... Respondents PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the decree and judgment dated 13.07.2001 rendered in A.S.No.107 of 2001 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Arupukottai, confirming the decree and judgment dated 08.08.1996 rendered in O.S.No.85 of 1993 on the file of the District Munsif of Aruppukottai. For Appellant : Mr.S.Subbiah For Respondents : No appearance