- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 27 July 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA 1766/2003
Judgment
JUDGMENT When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that the sold appellant passed away and he is not in a position to collect the details of the legal heirs of the deceased appellant.
¶2In view of the above submission, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.
27.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes skn To:
1.The Principal District Judge, Sivaganga.
2.The Principal District Munsif, Sivaganga.
3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. skn
27.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 27.07.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Periyakaruppan ... Appellant -vs- 1.Parvathi Ammal 2.The Tashildar, Sivagangai Taluk and Town. 3.The Collector, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 28.01.1999 made in A.S.No.164 of 1998 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Sivaganga confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 02.07.1998 made in O.S.No. 241 of 1995 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Sivaganga. For Appellant ... Mr.S.Ramesh for Mrs.V.Srimathy For Respondents ... Mr.R.Devaraj for R1
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.