VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Saroja v. Mani

DISMISSED AS ABATED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
19 July 2023
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
SA 1842/2003

Judgment

J U D G M E N T When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that sole appellant died. Once the sole appellant died, if steps have not been taken within 90 days, the appeal will be abated automatically.

¶2In this case, till date no steps have been taken and hence, this appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No

19.07.2023 am To

1.The Sub-Court, Pudukottai.

2.The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Keeranur.

¶3The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. am

19.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and C.M.P.No.16764 of 2003 Saroja ... Appellant Vs. 1.Mani 2.Arumugam 3.Palaniyammal 4.Thangapponnu 5.Vairam Ammal ... Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.30 of 2001 dated 21.11.2002 on the file of the Sub-Court, Pudukottai in confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.85 of 1995 dated 20.10.2000 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Keeranur. For Appellant : Mr.G.Sridharan For Respondents : Mr.P.Thiagarajan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.