VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Pannerselvam v. Govindasamy Pillai

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 July 2023
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
SA 1893/2003

Judgment

J U D G M E N T When the matter was taken up for hearing on 19.07.2023, there was no representation for the appellant, hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 21.07.2023 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the appellant and the respondent. The appeal is of the year 2003. Despite sufficient opportunity given to the appellant, the appellant has not come forward to prosecute the appeal. Therefore, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No

21.07.2023 am To

1.The Additional Sub-Court, Kumbakonam.

2.The Principal District Munsif, Kumbakonam.

¶3The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. am

21.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and C.M.P(MD)No.18187 of 2003 Pannerselvam ... Appellant Vs. Govindasamy Pillai ... Respondent PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree, dated 02.12.2002 made in A.S.No. 63 of 2002, on the file of the Additional Sub-Court, Kumbakonam confirming the judgment and decree dated 20.12.2001 made in O.S.No.20 of 2000, on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Kumbakonam. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : No appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.