State of Tamilnadu Rep.By v. T.Radhamaniammal

J U D G M E N T A Memo has been filed by the learned counsel for the appellants stating that LR. particulars of the deceased R1 was not furnished to him by the other side. Therefore, the Second Appeal stands dismissed as abated. No costs.

11.12.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No akv To

1.The Sub Court, Virudhunagar.

2.The District Munsif Court, Virudhunagar.

¶3The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.KALAIMATHI

,J.

akv S.A.No.1964 of 2003

11.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI S.A.No.1964 of 2003 1.State of Tamil Nadu represented by District Collector, Kamarajar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Divisional Engineer, Highways and Rural Works, Virudhunagar Division, Virudhunagar. ... Appellants -Vs- 1.T.Radhamaniammal 2.M.Jayarathinam 3.P.Premavathiammal ... Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 26.11.1999 made in A.S.No. 115 of 1997 on the file of the learned Sub Judge, Virudhunagar reversing the judgment and decree dated 29.09.1997 made in O.S.No.173 of 1995 on the file of the learned District Munsif Court, Virudhunagar. For Appellants : Mr.A.Baskaran Additional Government Pleader For Respondents : No appearance