- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 April 2023
- Bench
- P. Velmurugan
- Case no.
- SA 436/2003
Judgment
J U D G M E N T When the second appeal is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation on either side. The second appeal is pending from the year 2003 and despite sufficient opportunity was given to the appellant, he is not ready to proceed with the appeal.
2.In view of the above, this Second appeal is dismissed for default with cost of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lakh only) to be paid before the Registry (Judicial). In case, the appellant files an application for restoration, the Registry shall not take the application for restoration on file, unless he deposits the cost of Rs.1,00,000/-.
13.04.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No To
1.The Sub-Court, Tuticorin,
2.The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Tuticorin.
¶3The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P.VELMURUGAN
,J.
Ns
13.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN P.Shanmugam ....Appellant/Appellant/ 1st Defendant -Vs- 1.Paulkani Ammal ...1st Defendant/1st Respt./ Plaintiff 2.Syed Sulaiman 3.Vadapoo alias Chinnammal 4.Paulraj Nadar 5.Alagulingam 6.Mariammal ...Respondents 2 to 6/Defendants2to6 PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 09.08.2002 passed in A.S.No. 243 of 1997 by the Sub-Court, Tuticorin, confirming the judgment and decree dated 13.03.1996 passed in O.S.No.366 of 1995 by the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Tuticorin. For Appellant : Mr.Mathesh(Panel Advocate) (No appearance) For R1,3,5&6 : Mr.P.Swamy Ayyah (No appearance)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.