- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 April 2023
- Bench
- P. Velmurugan
- Case no.
- SA 611/2003
Judgment
J U D G M E N T When the second appeal is taken up for hearing today, it is reported that the sole respondent died in the year 2001. So far no steps have been taken.
2.In view of the above, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected C.M.P is closed.
13.04.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Ns To
1.The Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli,
2.The Additional Subordinate Judge, Tenkasi.
¶3The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. S.A.No.611oofo200a oP.VELMURUGANoo,Jo. Ns S.A.No.611oofo2003 and C.M.P.No.5708oofo2003 oooooooooo
13.04.2023 Pageo4oofo4
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and C.M.P.No.5708 of 2003 1.S.Periasamy 2.S.Senthoor Pandian 3.S.Sudalaiyandi ...Plaintiffs/Respts./ Appellants -Vs- Ganapathy Thevar ...Defdt./Appellant/ Respondent PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 21.11.2002 passed in A.S.No. 312 of 2001 by the Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli, preferred against the judgment and decree dated 12.09.2001 passed in O.S.No.108 of 1997 by the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tenkasi. For Appellants : Mr.M.Saravanan for M/s. Hema Sampath For Respondent : Mr.T.Rajaraman (No appearance)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.