- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 27 July 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA 1991/2003
Judgment
J U D G M E N T The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a Memo dated
18.07.2023, stating that the matter has been settled out of the Court and hence, he seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the second appeal and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the above, the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
27.07.2023 akv To
1.The I Additional Subordinate Judge, Trichirapalli.
2.The District Munsif, Musiri.
3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
,J.
akv A.S.No.1991 of 2003
27.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.Marudai ... Appellant -Vs- 1.Saraswathi Ammal 2.Thangarasu 3.Loganathan 4.Boopathy 5.Chandran 6.Shakuntala 7.Savithri 8.Logambal 9.S.Balasubramanian 10.Sundarambal ... Respondents PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.206 of 1999 on the file of the I Additional Subordinate Judge, Trichirapalli, dated 14.02.2003, in confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.378 of 1991 on the file of the District Munsif, Musiri, dated 16.11.1994. For Appellants : Mr.S.Ramesh for M/s.V.Srimathi For R3 : Mr.G.Vasudevan For RR2,4,5 to 10: No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.