Kalaiselvi v. Rajathi

JUDGMENT When the Second Appeal came up on 18.10.2023, since there was no representation for the appellants, it is posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'.

¶2R3 and R5 are represented through counsel.

¶3As there is no representation for the appellants today also, the Second Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

07.11.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To

1.The I Additional District Judge, P.C.R., Tiruchirapalli

2.The III Additional District Munsif, Tiruchirapalli.

3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.KALAIMATHI

, J.

mbi

07.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI 1.Kalaiselvi 2.P.Ganeshkumar, aged 18 years, (Rep. by his mother and natural guardian Tmt.P.Kalaiselvi) ...Appellants vs. 1.Rajathi 2.Minor Thamilarasai, aged 14 years, (Rep. by her mother and natural guardian Rajathi) 3.Workshop Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Ponmalai, Tiruchirapalli - 4. 4.The Chief Executive Officer, Southern Railway Employees Co-op. Credit Society Limited, Tiruchirapalli -1. 5.Regional Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Unit I, Tiruchirapalli -1. ... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 25.02.2004 in A.S.No.227 of 2003 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, P.C.R., Tiruchirapalli modifying the Judgment and Decree dated 10.06.2003 in O.S.No.988 of 2002 on the file of the III Additional District Munsif, Tiruchirapalli. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.A.Haja Mohideen for R3 Mr.D.Jeyam for R5 No appearance for R1, R2 and R4