Muruganandam v. Kuthalingam @ Asokan

JUDGMENT When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the appellants would submit that though several reminders have been given to the appellants, they did not give any instruction to conduct the case. Hence, the learned counsel reported "No Instruction". A memo dated 15.08.2023 has also been filed to that effect.

¶2Recording the said submission and memo dated 15.08.2023, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

16.08.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes skn To:

1.The Additional Sub Judge, Tankasi.

2.The District Munsif, Tenkasi

3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. S.ANo.1359oofo2004 KRISHNANoRAMASAMY,oJ. skn S.A.No.1359oofo2004 and C.M.P(MD)Nos.10632oofo2004o &o721otoo724oofo2017

16.08.2023

S.ANo.1359 of 2004 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 16.08.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.A.No.1359 of 2004 and C.M.P(MD)Nos.10632 of 2004 & 721 to 724 of 2017 1.Muruganandam 2.Palraj 3.Ganesan 4.Kanagaraj 5.Annamalaikani 6.Seethalakshmi ... Appellants -vs- 1.Kuthalingam @ Asokan 2.Natarajan 3.Chidambarakani Ammal 4.Navaneethakrishnan 5.Maheswari ... Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 31.12.2000 made in A.S.No.71 of 2002 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Tenkasi reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 20.06.2002 made in O.S.No. 355 of 1995 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tenkasi. S.ANo.1359 of 2004 For Appellants ... Mr.M.Saravanan For Respondents ... No appearance