- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 November 2023
- Bench
- S Justice R. Kalaimathi
- Case no.
- SA 1416/2004
Judgment
JUDGMENT As there was no representation for the appellant on 17.11.2023, the matter is posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'.
¶2Today also, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the Second Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
30.11.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To
1.The Principal District Judge, Pudukkottai
2.The District Munsif, Aranthangi
3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.KALAIMATHI
, J.
mbi
30.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI P.R.Karuppaiah ...Appellant vs. 1.Muthulakshmi 2.Nagammal 3.Govinda Thevar ... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 26.09.2003 in A.S.No.137 of 2001 on the file of the Principal District Court, Pudukkottai reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 13.08.2001 in O.S.No.112 of 1997 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Aranthangi. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance for R1 & R2
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.