Mallika, v. Palanisamy S/O.Thangavelu,

JUDGMENT As there was no representation for the appellant on earlier occasions, the matter is posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'.

¶2Today also, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the Second Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

30.11.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To

1.The Additional Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam

2.The District Munsif, Valangaiman at Kumbakonam

3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.KALAIMATHI

, J.

mbi

30.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI Mallika ...Appellant vs. Palanisamy ... Respondent Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 20.02.2004 in A.S.No.142 of 2003 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 25.07.2003 in O.S.No.43 of 2002 on the file of the District Munsif, Valangaiman at Kumbakonam. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.N.Balakrishnan