- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 14 December 2023
- Bench
- S Justice R. Kalaimathi
- Case no.
- SA 20/2004
Judgment
JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants filed a Memo dated
07.11.2023 stating that he has no instructions from the appellants and hence, the names of the appellants have been printed in the cause list today.
¶2The Second Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
14.12.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To
1.The Subordinate Judge, Sankarankoil
2.The Additional District Munsif, Sankarankoil
3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R.KALAIMATHI
, J.
mbi
14.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI 1.Palvannam Pillai (died) 2.Murugan 3.Chandran 4.Meenakshisundaram 5.Subbulakshmi ...Appellants vs. 1.Avudaithangam 2.Karpagammal ... Respondents (Appellants 4 and 5 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased 1st appellant and appellants 2 and 3 are recorded as LRs of the deceased 1st appellant vide order dated 14.09.2011 in M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2011 in S.A.No.20 of 2004) Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 18.09.2003 in A.S.No.56 of 2003 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Sankarankoil confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 18.06.2003 in O.S.No.285 of 2000 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Sankarankoil. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.