- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 19 June 2023
- Bench
- P. Velmurugan
- Case no.
- SA 305/2004
Judgment
JUDGMENT Sole appellant died and the petition in M.P.No.1 of 2007 has been filed to bring on record the legal representatives of the sole appellant. In that application notice was ordered and some of the respondents were served and some of the respondents were not served and for the private notice proof not filed.
¶2When the matter came up for hearing today, no representation for the petitioner/appellant. Therefore, this second appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.No.1 of 2007 is also dismissed. am
19.06.2023 To
1.The Sub-Court, Kuzhithurai.
2.The Additional District Munsif, Kuzhithurai.
3.The Record Keeper, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P.VELMURUGAN
, J.
am S.A.No.305 of 2004 and M.P.No.1 of 2007
19.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN S.A.No.305 of 2004 and M.P.No.1 of 2007 Selvanayagam ...Appellant -Vs- 1.Nadarajan 2.Kamalasanan alias Kamalesan 3.Ganesan 4.Kannammal alias Annammal 5.Palamma 6.Mariyanesam 7.Palayan Nadar ...Respondents PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree, dated 10.07.2003 made in A.S.No.17 of 2001 on the file of the Sub-Court, Kuzhithurai reversing the judgment and decree dated 01.12.2000 made in O.S.No.539 of 1996, on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Kuzhithurai. For Appellant : No appearance For R1 to R5 : Mr.C.Godwin
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.