Diwan Ali Rowther v. Arunachalam Nadar

JUDGMENT When the matter was taken up for hearing on 24.07.2023, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, it is listed today under the caption "for dismissal". Even today, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

26.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes skn To:

1.The Sub Judge, Tenkasi.

2.The District Munsif, Tenkasi.

3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. skn

26.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 26.07.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Diwan Ali Rowther ... Appellant -vs- 1.Arunachala Nadar 2.Shahul Hameed ... Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 26.06.1996 made in A.S.No.73 of 1992 on the file of the Sub Judge, Tenkasi confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 27.01.1990 made in O.S.No.183 of 1986 on the file of the District Munsif, Tenkasi. For Appellant ... No appearance For Respondents ... No appearance