- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 19 September 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA 670/2004
Judgment
JUDGMENT When the matter is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation for the appellant. Further, it is seen that the sole respondent died as early as in the year 2007. However, no steps have been taken till date. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.
19.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes skn To:
1.The Principal District Judge, Tuticorin.
2.The Additional District Munsif, Tiruchendur.
3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. skn
19.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 19.09.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY 1.Thangaselvi 2.Ponselvi ... Appellants -vs- A.Annadurai Nadar ... Respondent PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.11.2001 made in A.S.No.98 of 1998 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tuticorin reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 19.02.1998 made in O.S.No. 478 of 1995 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Tiruchendur. For Appellant ... No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.