- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 November 2023
- Bench
- S Justice R. Kalaimathi
- Case no.
- SA 930/2004
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI and C.M.P(MD)Nos.6826 and 10749 of 2004 S.A.No.930 of 2004
1.K.Natrayan
2.Palanisamy ... Plaintiffs/Respondents/ Appellants
-Vs-
1.Thangavel ...Defendant/Appellant/Respondent
2.The Executive Engineer, (Operation and Maintenance)Rural Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Karur-639 002.
3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Chinnadharapuram, Aravakurichi Taluk.
4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, K.Paramathi, Aravakurichi Taluk. ...Defendants 1to3/ Respondents/Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 17.10.2003 made in A.S.No.22 of 2003 on the file of the Sub-Court, Karur, reversing the judgment and decree dated 12.03.2002 in O.S.No.230 of 2001 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Karur. S.A.No.1385 of 2004
1.K.Natrayan
2.Palanisamy ... Plaintiffs/Respondents/ Appellants
-Vs-
1.The Executive Engineer, (Operation and Maintenance)Rural Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Karur-639 002.
2.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Chinnadharapuram, Aravakurichi Taluk.
3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, K.Paramathi, Aravakurichi Taluk. ...Defendants 1to3/ Appellants/Respondents
4.Thangavel ...4th Defendant/ 4th Respondent/Respondent PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 17.10.2003 made in A.S.No.15 of 2003 on the file of the Sub-Court, Karur, reversing the judgment and decree dated 12.03.2002 in O.S.No.230 of 2001 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Karur. For Appellants in both cases : No appearance For R1 in both cases : Mr.P.Thiagarajan For R2 & R3 in both cases : No appearance COMMON JUDGMENT When the matter came up for hearing on 31.10.2023, there was no representation for the appellants and the matter is posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'. The first respondent is represented through his counsel. Today also there is no representation for the appellants. Hence, these appeals stand dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
17.11.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet::Yes/No To
1.The Sub-Court, Karur.
2.The District Munsif Court, Karur.
¶3The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. R. KALAIMATHI
,J.
Ns
17.11.2023
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.