- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 August 2023
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- SA(MD) 477/2005
Judgment
J U D G M E N T When the matter was taken up for hearing on 21.07.2022, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he has no instruction from his client. Hence, fresh notice was ordered to the appellant. But the same was returned with an endorsement 'No Residence'.
¶2In view of the above, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
18.08.2023 akv To
1.The Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli.
2.The Principal District Munsif, Tirunelveli.
3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
,J.
akv
18.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Murugan ... Appellant Vs. 1.A.S.Ahamed Mohideen 2.Deva Andu 3.Sangu Thevar ... Respondents PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree of the learned Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli dated 20.08.2003 in A.S.No.56 of 2003 reversing the judgment and decree of the learned Principal District Munsif, Tirunelveli dated 22.06.2001 in O.S.No.77 of 1981. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.