VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Manipur High Court 2023 › High Court of Manipur

State of Manipur v. E. Mitrani Devi and Another

Allowed
Court
High Court of Manipur
Decided
4 August 2023
Bench
Ahanthem Bimol Singh, A. Guneshwar Sharma
Case no.
MC(WA) 37/2023

Judgment

MC(WA) No. 11 of 2023

Kh. Chaoba Singh & ors.

On the joint prayer made by the counsel appearing for the parties, list this case again on 24-08-2023.

Supp. IN. 1 SHOUGRA KPAM 12:48:52 +05'30' MC(WA) No. 104 of 2023

Ksh. Kamala Devi & anr.

Heard Mr. M. Devananda, learned Addl. AG appearing for the applicant and Mr. S. Samarjeet, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

The present application had been filed for bringing on record the Legal Representatives of the deceased principal respondents No. 4 and 5.

Mr. S. Samarjeet, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that he has no objection in allowing the present application and that he has been instructed to appear on behalf of the Legal Representatives of the deceased principal respondents No. 4 and 5.

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the record, we find sufficient ground for allowing the present application.

Accordingly, the present application is allowed.

Mr. M. Devananda, learned Addl. AG is directed to incorporate the name of the LRs of the deceased respondents No. 4 and 5 in the connected record of the writ appeal.

With the aforesaid direction, the present application is disposed of.

Supp. IN. 2 SHOUGRAK PAM DEVANAND A SINGH 12:49:09 +05'30' MC(WA) No. 105 of 2023

Addl. Chief Secretary (Finance) & ors.

Mr. M. Devananda, learned Addl. AG appearing for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the present application with liberty to file a fresh one.

Leave granted.

The present application is hereby dismissed as being withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

Supp. IN. 3 SHOUGRAK PAM 12:49:28 +05'30' MC(WA) No. 37 of 2023

E. Mitrani Devi & anr.

Heard Mr. M. Devananda, learned Addl. AG appearing for the applicant and Mr. S. Samarjeet, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

Mr. M. Devananda, learned Addl. AG submitted that through inadvertent mistake, while filing the connected writ appeal as well as the condone application, the State has failed to incorporate two persons, who are some of the petitioners in the connected writ petition. Accordingly, the present application had been filed with the prayer for allowing impleadment of the said two writ petitioners in the connected writ appeal as well as the condone application.

Mr. S. Samarjeet, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that he has no objection in allowing the present impleadment application.

In view of the submission made above, the present application is hereby allowed.

Mr. M. Devananda, learned Addl. AG is directed to implead the two persons in the present application as respondents No. 18 and 19 in the connected writ appeal as well as in the condone application.

With the aforesaid direction, the present application is disposed of.

Supp. IN. 4 SHOUGRA KPAM by 12:49:42 +05'30'

Source: High Court of Manipur, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.