VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Manipur High Court 2023 › High Court of Manipur

Seram Neken Singh v. Sanglakpam Preshyojit Sharma and Another

Allowed
Court
High Court of Manipur
Decided
18 January 2023
Bench
Ahanthem Bimol Singhauthor
Case no.
MC(El.Pet.) 147/2022

Judgment

El. Petn. No. 27 of 2022 Sanglakpam Preshyojit Sharma

… Petitioner Thongam Biswajit Singh & anr.

Ms. Sandhyarani, learned counsel appeared for the petitioner, Mr. S. Gunabanta, learned counsel appeared for the respondent No. 1 and Syed Murtaza Ahmed, learned counsel appeared for the respondent No. 2.

The counsel for the petitioner seeks one week time for filing replication to the written statement filed by respondent No. 2.

IN. 25 by 16:16:59 +05'30' El. Recr. Petn. No. 20 of 2022 Thongam Biswajit Singh

… Petitioner Sanglakpam Preshyojit Sharma & anr.

Ms. Sandhyarani, learned counsel appeared for the respondent No. 1 and Syed Murtaza Ahmed, learned counsel appeared for the respondent No. 2.

Mr. S. Gunabanta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks one week time as a last chance for filing replication to the written statement filed by respondent No. 1.

It is made clear that no further time will be granted after the next date.

IN. 26 by 16:17:47 +05'30' MC(El. Petn.) No. 108 of 2022 Thongam Biswajit Singh

… Applicant Sanglakpam Preshyojit Sharma

… Respondent

Mr. S. Gunabanta, learned counsel appearing for the applicant seeks one week time for filing replication to the written statement filed by respondent No. 1.

IN. 27 by 16:18:08 +05'30' MC(El. Petn.) No. 147 of 2022 Seram Nekan Singh

… Applicant Sanglakpam Preshyojit Sharma & anr.

Heard Syed Murtaza Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, Ms. Sandhyarani, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1, Mr. S. Gunabanta, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2.

The present application had been filed seeking leave of this court for allowing the applicant to file written statement in the connected Election Petition No. 27 of 2022. Ms. Sandhyarani, learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondent as well as Mr. S. Gunabanta, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 submitted that they have no objection in allowing the present application.

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the record, this court find sufficient ground for allowing the present application.

The present application is accordingly allowed.

Registry is directed to place on record the written statement of the respondent No. 2 in the connected Election Petition.

Misc .case stands disposed of.

IN. 28 16:18:28 +05'30'

Source: High Court of Manipur, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.