- Court
- High Court of Punjab and Haryana
- Decided
- 6 March 2026
- Bench
- Sumeet Goel
- Case no.
- CRM-M 10103/2026
Judgment
o 128o INoTHEoHIGHoCOURToOFoPUNJABoANDoHARYANAoATo CHANDIGARHo o Dateoofodecision:o06.03.2026o Dateoofouploading:o06.03.2026o o o HarchandoSingho@oChando o o o o o ….Petitionero o Versuso o StateoofoPunjabo o oooo o o o o ooooo….Respondento o o CORAM:o HON'BLEoMR.oJUSTICEoSUMEEToGOELo o Present:-o Mr.oL.S.oSekhon,oAdvocateoforotheopetitioner.oo o o o Mr.oHemantoAggarwal,oDAG,oPunjab.o o *****o SUMEEToGOEL,oJ.o(ORAL)oo o
1.o o Presento petitiono iso theo secondo attempt,o whicho haso beeno filedo underoSectiono483oofoBNSSo2023oforograntooforegularobailotootheopetitioneroino caseo bearingo FIRo No.18o datedo 26.02.2025,o registeredo foro theo offenceso punishableounderoSectionso22o&o29oofotheoNarcoticoDrugsoandoPsychotropico SubstancesoAct,o1985o(foroshorto'NDPSoAct'),oatoPoliceoStationoPassiana,o DistrictoPatiala.o
2.o o TheogravamenoofotheoFIRoinoquestionoisothatotheopetitioneroisoano accusedoofobeingoinvolvedoinoFIRopertainingotooNDPSoActoinvolvingo404o looseo capsuleso ofo maroono colouro bearingo markingo ofo Proxywelo Spaso containingo salto 'Tramadolo Hydrochloride'o ando 400o looseo tabletso ofo whiteo colouro containingo salto 'Dicyclomineo Hydrochloride',o allegedlyo recoveredo fromotheoco-accusedoofotheopetitioneronamelyoParmaloKaur.o HIgh Court Chandigarh 2o o o o
3.o o Learnedocounseloforotheopetitionerohasoiteratedothatotheopetitionero iso ino custodyo sinceo 11.03.2025.o o Learnedo counselo foro theo petitionero haso furtherosubmittedothatotheomandatoryoprovisionsoofotheoNDPSoActohaveonoto beenocompliedowith,oandothus,otheoprosecutionocaseosuffersofromoinherento defects.o Learnedo counselo haso furthero iteratedo thato soleo basiso too arrayo theo petitioneroasoanoaccusedoisotheodisclosureostatementoofoco-accused,onamelyo ParmaloKaur.oLearnedocounselohasofurtheroiteratedothatotheopetitionerohaso sufferedoincarcerationoforomoreothano11omonths.ooThus,oregularobailoisoprayedo for.oo
4.o o Learnedo Stateo counselo haso opposedo theo presento petitiono byo arguingothatotheoallegationsoraisedoagainstotheopetitioneroareoseriousoinonatureo and,othus,oheodoesonotodeserveotheoconcessionoofotheoregularobail.oLearnedo Stateocounselohasofurtherosubmittedothatotheoinstantobailopleaoisobarredobyotheo rigorso ofo Sectiono 37o ofo theo NDPSo Act,o ando thus,o theo sameo oughto too beo dismissed.oLearnedoStateocounseloseeksotooplaceoonorecordocustodyocertificateo datedo05.03.2026oinoCourt,owhichoisotakenoonorecord.oo
5.o o Iohaveoheardocounseloforotheorivalopartiesoandohaveogoneothrougho theoavailableorecordsoofotheocase.oo
6.o o Theopetitionerowasoarrestedoono11.03.2025oandochallanoisostillo notopresented.oTheopetitionerohasobeenoimplicatedoasoanoaccusedoinotheoFIRoino questionosolelyoonotheobasisoofodisclosureostatementoofoco-accusedoParmalo Kaur.ooAsoperotheoprosecutionoversion,othereoisonoootheromaterialoavailableotoo connecto theo petitionero witho theo contrabando excepto foro theo saido disclosureo statement.o Ito iso pertinento too noteo thato sucho disclosureo statements,o ino theo
o 3o o o o absenceoofocorroborativeoevidenceoholdolimitedoevidentiaryovalueoandocannoto beo soleo basiso foro implicatingo theo petitioner.o Theo relianceo ono thiso unsubstantiatedo statemento raiseso seriouso doubtso abouto theo fairnesso ando objectivityoofotheoinvestigation.oItoisonotoinodisputeothatotheopetitionerowasonoto presentoatotheospot.oTheoveracityoandoweightageorequiredotoobeoattachedotootheo disclosureostatementomadeobyotheoco-accusedowillobeofullyotestedoatotheotimeo ofotrial.oTheorivalocontentionsoraisedoatoBarogiveoriseotoodebatableoissuesoshallo beoratiocinatedouponoduringotheocourseoofotrial.oThisoCourtodoesonotodeemoito appropriateotoodelveodeepointootheseorivalocontentions,oatothisostage,olestoito mayo prejudiceo theo trial.o Nothingo tangibleo haso beeno broughto forwardo too indicateo theo likelihoodo ofo theo petitionero abscondingo fromo theo processo ofo justiceoorointerferingowithotheoprosecutionoevidence.oo
6.1.o o Atothisojuncture,oitowouldobeoappositeotooreferotooaojudgmento passedobyothisoCourtoinoAnshuloSardanaoversusoStateoofoPunjab,opassedoino CRM-M-65094-2024o (2025:o PHHC:004198),o wherein,o aftero relyingo upono theoratioodecidendioofotheojudgmentsoofotheoHon'bleoSupremeoCourtoinoTofano SinghoversusoStateoofoTamiloNadu,oAIRo2020oSupremeoCourto5592;oSmt.o Najmunisha,o Abdulo Hamido Chandmiyao @o Ladooo Bapuo versuso Stateo ofo Gujrat,o Narcoticso Controlo Bureau,o 2024o INSCo 290;o Stateo byo (NCB)o Bengaluruo vs.o Pallulabido Ahmado Arimuttao &o Anr.',o 2022o (1)o RCRo (Criminal)o762;oandoVijayoSinghovs.oTheoStateoofoHaryana,obearingoSpecialo LeaveotooAppealo(Crl.)oNo.(s)o1266/2023,odecidedoono17.05.2023,ohasoheldo thus:oo
o 4o o o o "6.3oo o Itoisoaowelloestablishedoprincipleoofolawothatoaoconfessiono madeobyoaoco-accusedounderoSectiono67oofotheoNDPSoActoisoinherentlyoao veryoweakopieceoofoevidence.ooSuchostatement(s),obyothemselves,ocannoto formo theo soleo basiso foro theo convictiono ofo ano individualo ando musto beo scrutinizedo witho utmosto cautiono ino conjunctiono witho othero substantiveo evidence.oMoreover,onoorecoveryohasobeenoeffectedofromotheopossessionoofo theopetitioner,owhoohasobeenosubsequentlyoimplicatedoasoanoaccusedosolelyo ono theo basiso ofo disclosureo statemento ofo theo co-accused.o However,o aso regularobailopertainsotoolifeoandolibertyoofoindividual,oCourtsoareoobligatedo toostrikeoaobalanceobetweenosafeguardingopersonalolibertyoandoensuringo theo effectiveo administrationo ofo justiceo aso alsoo investigation.o Theo finalo evidentiaryovalueoandoadmissibilityoofotheodisclosureostatementomadeobyoao co-accusedo fallo withino theo domaino ofo theo trialo Courto ando areo too beo adjudicatedoduringotheocourseoofotheotrialoinoaccordanceowithoestablishedo principlesoofolaw.oHowever,owhileoadjudicatingoaopleaofororegularobail,othiso Courto cannoto remaino obliviouso too theo circumstanceso undero whicho theo petitionerohasobeenoarraignedooroimplicated,oincludingotheonatureoofotheo allegations,otheoevidenceolinkingotheopetitionerotootheooffenceoasowelloasotheo specificoroleoattributedotootheopetitioneroinotheocommissionoofotheoallegedo offence.oAoprimaofacieoexaminationoofotheseofactorsoisoessentialotooensureo thatotheoprocessoofolawoisonotomisused,oabusedooromisdirected."oo o
6.2.o o Further,othisoCourtoinotheocaseoofoJaswinderoSinghoaliasoKalao versuso Stateo ofo Punjabo passedo ino CRM-M-33729-2025o (2025:PHHC:089161)ohasoheldothus:oo "14.o o Aso ao sequituro too above-saido rumination,o theo followingo postulatesoemerge:o
(I)o (i)o Aobailopleaoonomerits;oinorespectoofoanoFIRounderoNDPSoActo ofo 1985o involvingo offence(s)o undero Sectiono 19ooro Sectiono 24o oro Sectiono 27-Ao thereofo ando foro offence(s)o involvingo commercialo quantity;o iso essentiallyo requiredo too meeto witho theo rigour(s)o ofo Sectiono37oofoNDPSoAct.ooo o o (ii)oo Theorigour(s)oofoSectiono37oofoNDPSoActodoonotoapplyotooao bailoplea(s)oonomedicaloground(s),ointerimobailoonoaccountoofoanyo exigencyoincludingotheoreasonoofodemiseoofoaocloseofamilyorelativeo etc.o o o o (iii)o Theorigour(s)oofoSectiono37oofoNDPSoActopaleointooobliviono whenobailoisosoughtoforoonoaccountoofolongoincarcerationoinoviewoofo Articleo21oofotheoConstitutionoofoIndiaoi.e.owhereotheobail-applicanto
o 5o o o o hasosufferedolongounder-trialocustody,otheotrialoisoprocrastinatingo andofollyothereofoisonotoattributableotoosuchobail-applicant.ooo o II.o TheotwinoconditionsocontainedoinoSectiono37(1)(b)oofoNDPSoActoareo ino additiono too theo conditions/parameterso containedo ino Cr.P.C./BNSSooroanyootheroapplicableoextantolaw.oo o III.o TheotwinoconditionsocontainedoinoSectiono37(1)(b)oofoNDPSoActoareo cumulativeoinonatureoandonotoalternativeoi.e.obothotheoconditionso areorequiredotoobeosatisfiedoforoaobail-pleaotoobeosuccessful.ooo o IV.o Foro considerationo byo bailo Courto ofo theo conditiono stipulatedo ino Sectiono37(1)(b)(i)oofoNDPSoActoi.e.o"thereoareoreasonableogroundso forobelievingothatoheoisonotoguiltyoofosuchooffence":o o
(i)o Theo bailo Courto oughto too sifto througho allo relevanto material,oincludingocase-dairy,oexclusivelyoforotheolimitedo purposeoofoadjudicatingosuchobailoplea.o o
(ii)o Sucho consideration,o concerningo theo assessmento ofo guiltooroinnocence,oshouldonotomirrorotheosameodegreeoofo scrutinyorequiredoforoanoacquittaloofotheoaccusedoatotheofinalo adjudicationo&oculminationoofotrial.oo o
(iii)o Plea(s)o ofo defenceo byo applicant-accused,o ifo any,o includingo material/documentso ino supporto thereof,o mayo beo lookedointoobyotheobail-Courtowhileoadjudicatingosuchobailo plea.ooo o V.o ForoconsiderationoofotheoconditionostipulatedoinoSectiono37(1)(b)(ii)o i.e.o'heoisonotolikelyotoocommitoanyooffenceowhileoonobail':o
(i)o Theo wordo 'likely'o oughto too beo interpretedo aso requiringoaodemonstrableoandosubstantialoprobabilityoofore-offendingo byo theo bail-applicant,o rathero thano ao mereo theoreticaloone,oasonooCourtocanopredictofutureoconductoofo theobail-applicant.oo o
(ii)o Theoentireofactualomatrixoofoaogivenocaseoincludingo theoantecedentsoofotheobail-applicant,oroleoascribedotoohim,o andotheonatureoofooffenceoareorequiredotoobeodelvedointo.oo However,o theo involvemento ofo bail-applicanto ino anothero NDPS/othero offenceo cannoto ipsoo factoo resulto ino theo conclusionoofohisopropensityoforocommittingooffenceoinotheo future.o o
(iii)o Theobail-Courtomay,oatotheotimeoofograntingobail,o imposeo upono theo applicant-accusedo ao conditiono thato heo wouldosubmit,oatosuchoregularotimeoperiod/intervaloasomayo stipulatedobyotheoCourtograntingobail,oanoaffidavitobeforeo concernedo Specialo Judgeo ofo NDPSo Court/Illaqao (Jurisdictional)o Judicialo Magistrate/concernedo Policeo Station,o too theo effecto thato heo haso noto beeno involvedo ino commissionoofoanyooffenceoafterobeingoreleasedoonobail.ooIno theofactsoofoaogivenocase,oimpositionoofosuchoconditionomayo beoconsideredotoobeosufficientoforosatisfactionoofoconditiono enumeratedoinoSectiono37(1)(b)(ii).ooo
o 6o o o o o VI.oo Thereoisonoogainsayingothatotheonature,omodeoandoextentoofoexerciseo ofo powero byo ao Court;o whileo satisfyingo itselfo regardingo theo conditionso stipulatedo ino Sectiono 37o ofo NDPSo Act;o shallo dependo uponotheojudicialodiscretionoexercisedobyosuchoCourtoinotheofactso andocircumstancesoofoaogivenocase.oNooexhaustiveoguidelinesocano possiblyobeolaidodownoasotoowhatowouldoconstituteoparametersoforo satisfactionooforequirementounderoSectiono37o(ibid)oasoeveryocaseo hasoitsoownouniqueofacts/circumstances.ooMakingosuchoanoattemptoiso nothingobutoaoutopianoendeavour.ooErgo,othisoissueoisobestoleftotootheo judicialo wisdomo ando discretiono ofo theo Courto dealingo witho sucho matter."o o
6.3.o o Inothisoviewoofotheomatter,otheorigoroimposedounderoSectiono37o ofotheoNDPSoActostandsodiluted.oo
6.4.o o Indubitably,otheopresentopetitionoisotheosecondoattemptoonobehalfo ofotheopetitioneroforosecuringoregularobail.ooTheofirstooneobearingono.oCRM-M-39843-2025owasodismissedoasowithdrawnoono31.07.2025o(AnnexureoP-3).ooo However,okeepingoinoviewotheoentiretyoofofactsoandocircumstanceoofotheocaseo inohandoespeciallyokeepingoinoviewotheoextendedocustodyoandopaceoofotrial,o thiso Courto iso inclinedo too favourablyo considero theo instanto pleao foro bail.o Ao profitableoreference,oinothisoregard,ocanobeomadeotooaojudgmentoofothisoCourto passedoinoCRA-S-2332-2023otitledoasoRafiqoKhanoversusoStateoofoHaryanao andoanother;orelevantowhereoforeadsoasounder:oo "10.o o Asoanoepilogueotootheoaboveodiscussion,otheofollowingoprincipleso emerge:oo Io Second/successiveoregularobailopetition(s)ofiledoisomaintainableo ino lawo &o henceo sucho petitiono oughto noto too beo rejectedo solelyo ono theo groundoofomaintainabilityothereof.o o II.oo Suchosecond/successiveoregularobailopetition(s)oisomaintainableo whetheroearlieropetitionowasodismissedoasowithdrawn/dismissedoasonoto pressed/dismissedoforonon-prosecutionooroearlieropetitionowasodismissedo onomerits.oo o IIIo oForotheosecond/successiveoregularobailopetition(s)otoosucceed,o theopetitioner/applicantoshallobeoessentially/pertinentlyorequiredotooshowo substantialochangeoinocircumstancesoandoshowingoofoaomereosuperficialo oroostensibleochangeowouldonotosuffice.oTheometaphoricoexpressionoofo
o 7o o o o seekingo second/successiveo bailo plea(s)o oughto noto beo abstractedo intoo literalo iterationso ofo petition(s)o withouto substantial,o effectiveo ando consequentialochangeoinocircumstances.oo o IVo oNooexhaustiveoguidelinesocanopossiblyobeolaidodownoasotoowhato wouldoconstituteosubstantialochangeoinocircumstancesoasoeveryocaseohaso itsoownouniqueofacts/circumstance.oMakingosuchoanoattemptoisonothingo butoanoutopianoendeavour.ooErgo,othisoissueoisobestoleftotootheojudicialo wisdomoandodiscretionoofotheoCourtodealingowithosuchosecond/successiveo regularobailopetition(s).o Vo oInocaseoaoCourtochoosesotoograntosecond/successiveoregularobailo petition(s),o cogento ando lucido reasonso areo pertinentlyo requiredo too beo recordedo foro grantingo sucho pleao despiteo sucho ao pleao beingo second/successiveo petition(s).o Ino othero words,o theo causeo foro ao Courto havingo successfullyo countenanced/entertainedo sucho second/successiveo petition(s)ooughtotoobeoreadilyoandoclearlyodecipherableofromotheosaido orderopassed."o o o
7.o o AsoperotheocustodyocertificateofiledotodayobyotheolearnedoStateo counsel,otheopetitionerohasosufferedoincarcerationoforoaoperiodoofo11omonthso ando 21o dayso &o iso showno too beo involvedo ino anyo sixo othero FIRs/cases.oo However,othisofactumocannotobeoaogroundosufficientobyoitself,otoodeclineotheo concessionooforegularobailotootheopetitioneroinotheoFIRoinoquestionowhenoao caseo iso madeo outo foro granto ofo regularo bailo quao theo FIRo ino questiono byo ratiocinatingouponotheofacts/circumstancesoofotheosaidoFIR.oRelianceoinothiso regardocanobeoplacedouponotheojudgmentoofotheoHon'bleoSupremeoCourtoino MaulanaoMohd.oAmiroRashadiov.oStateoofoU.P.oandoanother,o2012o(1)oRCRo (Criminal)o586;oaoDivisionoBenchojudgmentoofotheoHon'bleoCalcuttaoHigho CourtoinocaseoofoSridharoDasov.oState,o1998o(2)oRCRo(Criminal)o477o&o judgmentsoofothisoCourtoinoCRM-MoNo.38822-2022otitledoasoAkhileshoSingho v.o Stateo ofo Haryana,o decidedo ono 29.11.2021,o ando Balrajo v.o Stateo ofo Haryana,o1998o(3)oRCRo(Criminal)o191.o o o Sufficeo too say,o furthero detentiono ofo theo petitionero aso ano undertrialoisonotowarrantedoinotheofactsoandocircumstancesoofotheocase.oo
o 8o o o o
8.o o Inoviewoofoabove,otheopresentopetitionoisoallowed.oPetitioneroiso orderedotoobeoreleasedoonoregularobailoonohisofurnishingobail/suretyobondsotoo theosatisfactionoofotheoLd.oconcernedotrialoCourt/DutyoMagistrate.oHowever,o ino additiono too conditionso thato mayo beo imposedo byo theo concernedo trialo Court/DutyoMagistrate,otheopetitioneroshalloremainoboundobyotheofollowingo conditions:oo
(i)o Theopetitioneroshallonotomis-useotheolibertyogranted.oo
(ii)oo Theopetitioneroshallonototamperowithoanyoevidence,ooralooro documentary,oduringotheotrial.oo
(iii)oo Theopetitioneroshallonotoabsentohimselfoonoanyodateobeforeo theotrial.oo
(iv)oo Theo petitionero shallo noto commito anyo offenceo whileo ono bail.oo
(v)oo Theopetitioneroshallodepositohisopassport,oifoany,owithotheo trialoCourt.oo
(vi)o Theo petitionero shallo giveo hiso cellphoneo numbero too theo Investigatingo Officer/SHOo ofo concernedo Policeo Stationo andoshallonotochangeohisocell-phoneonumberowithoutoprioro permissionoofotheotrialoCourt/IllaqaoMagistrate.oo
(vii)o Theopetitioneroshallonotoinoanyomannerotryotoodelayotheo trial.oo
(viii)o Theopetitioneroshallosubmit,oonotheofirstoworkingodayoofo everyo month,o ano affidavit,o beforeo theo concernedo trialo Court,o too theo effecto thato heo haso noto beeno involvedo ino commissionoofoanyooffenceoafterobeingoreleasedoonobail.o Ino caseo theo petitionero iso foundo too beo involvedo ino anyo offenceo afterohisobeingo enlargedo ono bailoinotheo presento FIR,oonotheobasisoofohisoaffidavitoorootherwise,otheoStateoiso mandatedotoomove,oforthwith,oforocancellationoofohisobailo whicho plea,o buto ofo course,o shallo beo ratiocinatedo upono meritsothereof.oo o
9.o o Inocaseoofobreachoofoanyoofotheoaforesaidoconditionsoandothoseo whichomayobeoimposedobyoconcernedotrialoCourt/DutyoMagistrateoasodirectedo hereinaboveo oro upono showingo anyo othero sufficiento cause,o theo State/complainanto shallo beo ato libertyo too moveo cancellationo ofo bailo ofo theo petitioner.oo
o 9o o o o
10.oo o Orderedoaccordingly.oo
11.o o Nothingosaidohereinaboveoshallobeoconstruedoasoanoexpressionoofo opinionoonotheomeritsoofotheocase.oo
12.oo o Sinceotheomainocaseohasobeenodecided,opendingomiscellaneouso application,oifoany,oshalloalsoostandsodisposedooff.o o
o o o o ooooooo o (SUMEEToGOEL)o o oooooooooooooooooooooo o o ooooooooooooooooooooo oJUDGEo Marcho06,o2026o Naveeno o o Whetherospeaking/reasoned:o o Yes/Noo o o o Whetheroreportable:o o o Yes/Noo o
o
Source: High Court of Punjab and Haryana, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.