Anil Kumar and Anr v. State of Haryana and Ors

CWP No. 22948 of 2018 (O&M) -1-oooo2023:PHHC:081289o o IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP No. 22948 of 2018 (O&M) Reserved on:10.05.2023 Pronounced on:02.06.2023

Anil Kumar and another ...Petitioners Vs State of Haryana and others …Respondents

¶2CWP No.27292 of 2018 (O&M)

Ravinder Kumar ...Petitioner Vs

State of Haryana and another …Respondents

¶3CWP No.21908 of 2018 (O&M)

Pardeep Kumar ...Petitioner Vs

State of Haryana and another ...Respondents

¶4CWP No.32398 of 2018 (O&M

Parveen Saroha ...Petitioner Vs

State of Haryana and others ...Respondents

¶5CWP No.34119 of 2019 (O&M)

Ankit Malik and another ...Petitioner Vs

Haryana State Selection Commission and another ...Respondents

¶6CWP No.24062 of 2018 (O&M)

Neha ...Petitioner Vs

Haryana State Selection Commission and another ...Respondents

¶7CWP No.23047 of 2018 (O&M)

Vikas Dhiman ...Petitioner CWP No. 22948 of 2018 (O&M) -2-oooo2023:PHHC:081289o o

State of Haryana and another ...Respondents

¶8CWP No.20841 of 2018 (O&M)

Baljinder Kumar and others ...Petitioners Vs

State of Haryana and others ...Respondents

CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR Present: Mr. Jasbir Mor, Advocate for the petitioners in CWP No.22948 of 2018.

Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP No.23047 of 2018.

Mr. Ajay Vijarania, Advocate for the petitioners in CWP No.27292 of 2018.

Mr. Suresh Kumar Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP No.21908 of 2018.

Mr. Jasbir Mor, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP No.32398 of 2018.

Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for the petitioners in CWP No.34119 of 2019.

Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP No.24062 of 2018.

Mr. Sunil K. Nehra, Advocate For the petitioners in CWP No.20841 of 2018.

Mr. Kapil Bansal, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Narinder Singh Behgal, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. B.R. Mahajan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Advocate for respondent-HSAMB.

Mr. Saurabh Chawla, Advocate for Mr. Nitin Kaushal, Advocate for respondent No.3-AICTE.

Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate and Mr. Saloni Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2 in CWP No.32398 of 2018.

CWPoNo.o22948oofo2018o(O&M)o o -3-oooo2023:PHHC:081289o o o JAISHREEoTHAKURoJ.o

1.k ThisoorderoofomineoshallodisposeoofoeightowritopetitionsobearingoCWPo Nos.22948,o23047,o21908,o24062,o27292,o32398,o20841oofo2018oando34119o ofo2019,oasotheogrievanceoraisedobyotheopetitioner(s)oinoallotheowritopetitionsoiso thatotheyohaveonotobeenocalledoforointerviewoonotheogroundothatotheyodidonoto possesso requisiteo sixo monthso certificateo ino computero fromo ao recognizedo institution.o

2.k Inobrief,ofacts,owhichohaveoledotootheofilingoofotheoinstantowritopetition,o areothatoHaryanaoStaffoSelectionoCommission,oPanchkulao(HSSCoinoshort)o hado publishedo Advertisemento No.7/2015o datedo 10.07.2015o foro directo recruitmento ofo variouso categorieso ofo postso aso mentionedo ino theo saido advertisement.oInopursuanceotootheosaidoadvertisement,otheopetitionersoinotheo afore-captionedowritopetitionsohadoappliedoforovariousoposts,odetailsoofowhicho areotabulatedoasounder:-o CWPoNo.22948oofo2018o Nameo ofo theo Advt.o Cat.o No.o &o Essentialoqualificationo Qualificationoofotheo petitionero ando No.o nameoofoposto petitionero Cat.oo

i)oAniloKumaro 7/15o Cato No.19,o i)k Graduationo i)oB.oTech.o (General)o Auctiono witho55%omarksofromo ii)oM.oTecho o Recordero ao recognisedo iii)o Diplomao ino o Universityo witho sixo Computero o monthso certificateo ino Applicationo fromo o computero fromo ao RashtriyaoSakshartao o recognisedo Missiono ITo o Institutions;oandoo Educationoo o ii)oHindi/Sanskritouptoo iv)o Diplomao ino o Matrico Standardo oro Webo Technologyo o higheroeducation.o fromoHARTRONo o o o

ii)oSuniloKumarooo (dismissedo aso notopressed)o CWPoNo.34119oofo2019o

i)o Ankito Maliko Aso Asoaboveo Asoaboveo i)o B.Como (General)o aboveo o o (Vocational)o o o o o ii)o Diplomao ino CWPoNo.o22948oofo2018o(O&M)o o -4-oooo2023:PHHC:081289o o o o o o Applicationo fromo o o o o Paraso Computero o o o o EducationoCentreo o o o o o o o o o i)oB.Como o o o o ii)o Diplomao ino

ii)oAmito Aso Asoaboveoo Asoaboveoo Officeo aboveo Managemento fromo BharatoComputero&o Managemento Technologyoo o CWPoNo.23047oofo2018o VikasoDhimano Aso Asoaboveoo o i)o B.Techo (OSP-BCA)o aboveoo Asoaboveo (Electricalo &o Electronicso Engineering)o

ii)o Diplomao (Instrumentationo &o Controlo fromo Haryanao Stateo BoardoofoTechnicalo Education)o CWPoNo.20841oofo2018o

i)o Balindero Aso Cat.o No.17,o Asoaboveo i)o M.Sc.o Kumaro (BCAo aboveoo Mandio (Mathematics)o category)o Supervisor-ii)o 6o monthso o cum-Feeo DiplomaoinoGraphico o Collectoroo Designingo fromo C-o Pointo Computero o (Firmo &o Societyo o Haryana)o o iii)o 6o monthso o Diplomao ino o Enterpriseo o Networkingo fromo o Centreo foro o Developmento ofo o Advanceo o Computing)o

ii)o Amandeepo o Singho (alreadyo o selected)o o o o

iii)o Pankajo i)oB.Techo Kumaro(BCA)o (Mechanicalo Engineering)o

ii)ComputeroCourseo fromo Tatao Infotecho Educationo

iii)o Foundationo CourseoonoAutocado fromo CADDo Centre,o Kurukshetra.o CWPoNo.27292oofo2018o Ravindero Aso Asoaboveoo Asoaboveoo i)o Bacheloro ofo Kumaro aboveoo Engineeringo (General)o (Electronicso &o CWP No. 22948 of 2018 (O&M) -&-oooo2023:PHHC:081289o o Comm.oEn--.).o

ii)o Certificateo Courseo fromo 6atao 1nfotecho !Aulo B2o too AproB3)o

iii)o Certificateo courseoonoAdvanceo Co =ro-rammin-(o #oft*areo En--.o 364Coando4oderno 6elecommunicationo o CWPoNo.21908oofo2018o =ardeepo umaro Aso Asoa9oveoo Asoa9oveoo i)o 4.6echo !5CA)o A9oveoo !Electronicso &o Comm.oEn--.)oo

ii)o 5.6echo !Electronicso &o Comm.oEn--.)o CWPoNo.32398oofo2018o =arveeno#arohao Aso Asoa9oveoo Asoa9oveoo i)o 5.o Como !"eneral)o a9oveoo !;ocationalo Course)o CWPoNo.24062oofo2018o Nehaoo Aso Asoa9oveoo Asoa9oveoo i)o 5.6echo a9oveoo !Electronicso &o Comm.)o

¶3Petitioners herein being duly eligible in their respective categories of posts submitted their online applications. Being successful in the written examination conducted by the respondent-Commission, they were called for scrutiny of documents. They appeared before the competent authorities for scrutiny of documents and submitted requisite documents pertaining to their qualifications. However, they were surprised to find that their names were not reflected in the list of candidates called for the interview. They were orally informed by the respondent-Commission that they did not possess the requisite six months certificate in computer from a recognized institution and therefore, they did not qualify for interview.

¶4Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would contend that they have appended requisite certificates in computer to establish that they have done their six months course in computer from registered institutes. It was CWP No. 22948 of 2018 (O&M) -@-oooo2023:PHHC:081289o o further argued that non-consideration of said certificates and subsequent decision of the Haryana Staff Selection Commission in enlisting 16 institutions as recognized institutions for selection on posts in question changes rules of the game after selection process put into motion and therefore, petitioners herein are put at a disadvantage. It was also argued that petitioners, who have done Bachelor of Technology have also studied computer as a subject while pursuing their degree and therefore, the same ought to have been taken into consideration as a qualification equivalent to or higher than six months course in computer.

¶5Additionally, learned counsel appearing for petitioner-Ankit Malik in CWP No.34119 of 2019 and the counsel appearing for petitioner-Parveen Saroha in CWP No.21908 of 2018 would argue that petitioners have done their B.Com (Vocational Course) degree wherein they studied subjects of Computer Fundamental & Logical Org-1, Computer Fundamental & Logical Org-2, Fundamental of Database System-II, Data Structures and SAD CA6 & Data Structures & SAD CA 6 in semesters 1 to 6 respectively, which is higher than a six months course in computer. Reliance has also been placed upon a certificate issued by the Principal, Arya PG College, Panipat (Annexure P-8) in favour of petitioner-Ankit Malik in CWP No.34119 of 2019 wherein it is stated that the petitioner has done Bachelor of Commerce (Vocational) 3 years degree and contents of subjects studied is higher in comparison to six months course in computer.

¶6Learned counsel appearing for petitioners in CWP Nos.27292 of 2018 and 20841 of 2018 would argue that petitioners namely Ravinder Kumar and Pankaj Kumar respectively have done their computer courses from Tata Infotech, which had entered into an agreement with the Government of CWP No. 22948 of 2018 (O&M) -$-oooo2023:PHHC:081289o o Haryana for imparting computer education as an optional subject in the Government Educational Institutes and therefore, their certificates ought to have been considered as the one obtained from recognized institutions.

¶7Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents would urge that terms and conditions of the advertisement clearly mentioned that only six months computer certificates issued by the recognized institutes would be taken into consideration and therefore, there is no infirmity in the selection process or not taking the computer certificates appended by the petitioners into consideration, as they have been issued by registered institutes and not by recognized institutes.

¶8I have heard learned counsel for the parties and with their assistance have gone through the pleadings of the case.

¶9The facts are not in dispute that the petitioners herein had applied for the posts of Mandi Supervisor-cum-Fee Collector and Auction Recorder under Category Nos.17 and 19 respectively in pursuance to Advertisement No.7/2015. For both the aforesaid posts, besides graduation with 55% marks from a recognized University, a six months certificate in computer from recognized institution is mandatory. In CWP No.20394 of 2018 titled as Prince Vs. State of Haryana and others decided on 14.11.2018, a decision taken on 07.09.2018 by the Haryana Staff Selection Commission with regard to the institutions, which were to be considered as recognized institutions for six months course in computer for the post of Mandi Supervisor-cum-Fee Collector. Details of said 16 institutions are as under:- "01.oOneoyearoDiplomaoforoComputeroOperatoroandoProgrammingo Assistant,oDeskoTopoPublishingoOperator,oComputeroHard areoando !et orko "aintenan#eo ando si$o montho Diplomao ofo Datao %ntryo CWPoNo.o22948oofo2018o(O&M)o o -8-oooo2023:PHHC:081289o o Operatoro issuedo byo Skillo Developmento ando Industrialo Traniningo Department.o

02.oCertificateoCourseo(144ohours)oofoC-DAC.o

03.oCertificateoCourseoofoHKCL.o

04.oCertificateoCourseoofoHARTRON.o

05.o Allo Engineeringo Degreeo /o Bacheloro Degreeo /o Mastero Degreeo (differento nomenclature)o ino Computero /o Computero Engineeringo /o ComputeroScienceo/oInformationoTechnologyo/oComputeroApplicationo e.g.oB.Techo/oBEo/oB.Sc.oEngg.o/oBCAo/oB.SC.o/oMastersoinoComputero/o ComputeroScienceo/oInformationoTechnologyo/oComputeroApplicationo recognizedoforoAICTEo/oUGC.o

06.oHARTRONoDiplomaoinoFinancialoAccountingowithoHARTRONo SkilloCentre.o

07.o Diploma/Computero Courseo fromo Districto Councilo foro Childo Welfare.o

08.oDiploma/ComputeroCourseofromoRedoCrossoSociety.o

09.o Diploma/Computero Courseo fromo Nationalo Instituteo ofo Skillo Developmento(NISD)oapprovedofromoMHRD/AnyoStateoGovernment.o

10.o Diploma/Computero Courseo fromo Districto Ruralo Developmento Agencyo(DRDA).o

11.oDiploma/ComputeroCourseofromoNIELITo(MinistryoofoIT,oGovt.oofo India).o

12.o Diploma/Computero Courseo fromo anyo wingo ofo Indiano Forceo (Army/AiroForce/Navy).o

13.oDiploma/ComputeroCourseofromoET&ToCorporationoLtd.o CWP No. 22948 of 2018 (O&M) -'-oooo2023:PHHC:081289o o 1+.oComputeroDiplomaoissuedobyoaoCollegeoaffiliated3ore#ogni5edotoo 6ni'ersityo*framedoundero&tateoA#t3CentraloA#t,.o

12.oP7DCAoissuedobyo6ni'ersity.o

18.o Threeo yearso Diplomao ino Computer3(To fromo Polyte#hni#o re#ogni5edobyoTe#hni#alo%du#ationoDepartment.?o

¶10The question that needs consideration would be whether petitioners herein, who have done their six months computer course from an institute, which is though not recognized as one of the 16 institutes as enlisted by the Haryana Staff Selection Commission, but stands duly registered, would be eligible for the posts of Mandi Supervisor-cum-Fee Collector/Auction Recorder? Secondly, would the action of the respondent-State in holding the petitioners ineligible on account of not possessing a six months computer certificate from any of the 16 institutions tantamount to changing rules of the game after initiation of selection process.

¶11In the opinion of this Court, answer of both the questions would be in negative. The advertisement i.e. Advertisement No.7/2015 clearly specified that the computer certificate would have to be issued from a 'recognized institute' and not merely from a registered institute. It is worthwhile to note that most institutes open after getting themselves registered, but do not impart education and hand out certificates with impunity. No classes are held, as there is no teaching staff nor any infrastructure. Most of these institutes get registered, as it is easy to earn off the students, who are keen to get a certificate without any actual education being imparted, whereas that is not the case where institutes are recognized by the State Government itself. Computer education is of practical nature and therefore, action of the respondent-State in short-listing institutions as recognized institutions, CWP No. 22948 of 2018 (O&M) -1B-oooo2023:PHHC:081289o o which impart computer education while fulfilling the parameters of qualification of faculty imparting education, number of computers, number of class rooms with basic needs as well as the infrastructure and are actually authorized to issue certificates, cannot be said to be changing rules of game after initiation of selection process. Petitioners have no locus to say that their non-selection has been impacted on account of changing rules of game midway, since they themselves do not possess six months certificate in computer from a 'recognized institute'. Employer has absolute right to adjudge the suitability of the candidates whom they want to select for running administration. Therefore, petitioners herein, who do not possess six months certificate in computer from any of the 16 institutes as held to be recognized institutions for selection to the posts in question by the Haryana Staff Selection Commission, cannot be considered to be eligible.

¶12The argument raised by counsel appearing for the petitioners in CWP Nos.27292 of 2018 and 20841 of 2018 that petitioners namely Ravinder Kumar and Pankaj Kumar respectively have done their computer courses from Tata Infotech and their certificates are issued by government educational institutions, therefore they have to be held eligible, is not sustainable. In the judgment rendered a Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.16953 of 2009 titled as KaramoSinghoVs.oStateoofoHaryanaoando others decided on 06.11.2009, which has been upheld upto Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, it has been held as under:- "Merely because the Tata Infotech Limited has entered into an agreement (Annexure P-2) with the Government of Haryana, for imparting computer education as an optional subject in the Government Educational Institutions (Schools, Colleges, Industrial CWP No. 22948 of 2018 (O&M) -11-oooo2023:PHHC:081289o o Training Institutions and Vocational Education Institutions) for short duration of computer courses, will not make the certificates (Annexures P-3 and P-4), issued by the Tata Infotech Limited, during that training, as a valid one year Diploma in computer. These certificates have been issued for participation in computer training for a duration of 90 and 120 hours. The students, who are studying in Government Education Institutions attended those courses as an optional subject and they were given the certificates for that. Those certificates are not equivalent to one year Diploma in computer, which itself is a separate course. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner could not show any material/order that those certificates have been recognized by the Government as equivalent to one year Diploma course in computer. In absence of any such recognition by the Government, it cannot be held that those certificates issued by Tata Infotech Limited with counter signatures of the Principal of the College, can be considered as equivalent to one year Diploma in computer. Similar is the position with regard to the certificate (Annexure P-5) issued by the Webs Computer Education. Therefore, in my opinion, the petitioner has been rightly held to be not entitled for appointment on the post of Field Inspector (Stores) in Hafed, as he is not possessing the essential minimum qualification i.e. one year Diploma in computer.

¶13In view of the aforesaid fact, certificates issued by Tata Infotech Limited cannot be taken into consideration.

¶14The argument raised by counsel appearing for petitioners that some of the petitioners have done their B.Tech with computer as one of the subjects CWP No. 22948 of 2018 (O&M) -12-oooo2023:PHHC:081289o o and therefore, the same ought to have been taken into consideration looks attractive, but equivalence of a qualification is not a matter which can be determined by this Court in exercise of its judicial review. For instance, in CWP No.24062 of 2018, petitioner did B.Tech in Electronics and Communication Engineering with Fundamental of Computer and Programming, Computer Programming Lab and Data Structures and rd thComputer Design Hardware in 3 and 5 Semester respectively. In CWP No.21908 of 2018, petitioner-Pardeep Kumar while doing his B.Tech (Electronics & Communication Engineering) studied Fundamentals Of Computer & Programming, Computer Programming Lab, Computer Communications, Computer Architecture & Organ, Computer Networks IT st rd th thand Data Communication as subjects related to computer in 1 , 3 , 5 , 6 thand 7 Semester. Similarly, petitioners in CWP No.32398 of 2018 and 34119 of 2019 have done B.Com with vocational course and studied Computer Fundamental & Logical Org, Fundamental of Database System, st thCAD and Advanced Computer Application as subjects in 1 to 6 semesters respectively. Determination of equivalence of any qualification is domain of experts and therefore, this Court restrains itself from going into the issue whether the subjects studied by petitioners as mentioned above would be equivalent to six months course in computer as required under the advertisement. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of U.P.P.S.C. through its Chairman v. Rahul Singh, 2018 AIR (Supreme Court) 2861 has held, "Judges are not and cannot be experts in all fields and, therefore, they must exercise great restraint and should not overstep their jurisdiction to upset the opinion of the experts." It would be appropriate to refer to the judgments as rendered by the Supreme Court to the effect that the courts CWP No. 22948 of 2018 (O&M) -13-oooo2023:PHHC:081289o o should refrain from giving their own opinion over and above the opinion given by an Expert Committee. The judgements of the Supreme Court in this regard are Kanpur University through Vice Chancellor and others v. Samir Gupta and others (1983) 4 SCC 309, Rishal and others v. Rajasthan Public Service Commission and others (2018) 8 SCC 81, Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission, through its Chairman and another v. Rahul Singh and another (2018) 7 SCC 254 and Sarita Meena v. State of Rajasthan 2021 (1) RLW 650. The Division Bench of Delhi High Court in National Board Of Examination v. Association Of Md Physicians, 2022 AIR (Delhi) 246, has also recently held that Judges are not and cannot be experts in all fields, and the opinion of experts cannot be supplanted by a Court overstepping its jurisdiction.

¶15At this juncture, this Court also takes note of the fact that in CWP No.13609 of 2020 titled as @ikaso&ingho@s.o&tateoofoHaryanaoandoothers, this Court, with consent of parties, vide interim order dated 11.01.2023 had sent the matter to the Registrar of MDU, Rohtak to constitute an expert committee to examine the issue of equivalence of study of computer education as done by the petitioners during their B.Sc. course with six months computer certificate as required under the same advertisement i.e. Advertisement No.7/2015. Pursuant thereto, Registrar, MDU submitted his report dated 17.02.2023, which has not been challenged till today. The relevant part of the said report is reproduced as under:- "…After perusal of the DMCs in r/o Mr. Vikas Singh, one of the petitioners who has passed B.Sc. with Computer Science as a subject from KUK (State University recognized by UGC) as well as the copy of the advertisement, List of Computer Diplomas for the post etc., the CWPoNo.o22948oofo2018o(O&M)o o -14-oooo2023:PHHC:081289o o Committeeoafterodetailedodeliberationowasoofotheoconsideredoopiniono ando recommendedo thato anyo studento witho B.Sc.o havingo studiedo Computero Science/Computero Application/ITo subjecto oro equivalento subjecto mayo beo consideredo aso equivalento too sixo monthso Computero CourseoCertificateorequiredoforotheosaidopost(s),owhichoisoalsoocoveredo inotheoListoofoCoursesomentionedoatoSr.oNo.5oinotheoabove-saidomemoo asowelloasoinotheoAdvt."o

16.o Similarly,osinceoitoisotheocontentionoofotheocounseloforotheopetitionerso thatotheyohaveoaohigheroqualification,ohavingostudiedocomputeroinotheodegreeo courseo foro sixo monthso oro more,o theo mattero oughto toobeo placedo beforeo ano expertobodyotoolookointootheoissue.ooPossessingohigheroqualificationocannotobeo heldoagainstotheopetitionersobyodeclaringothemoineligibleoonotheogroundothato theyodidonotopossessoaosixomonthsocertificateoinocomputer.o

17.o InoviewoofotheoaforesaidofindingsorenderedobyothisoCourt,otheoultimateo resultoofotheowritopetitionsoisoasounder:-o CWPo No.22948o Dismissed.o ofo2018o CWPo No.34119o Disposedo of.o o Quao petitionero No.1-Ankito Malik,o ofo2019o Respondentsoareodirectedotooreconsiderotheoqualificationoofo petitionero byo obtainingo ano experto opiniono (Registrar,o MDUoasohasobeenodoneoinoCWPoNo.o13609oofo2020)owitho regardo too equivalenceo ofo subjectso studiedo byo himo ino B.Como (vocationalo course)o witho sixo monthso courseo ino computerowithinoaoperiodoofotwooweeksofromoreceiptoofo certifiedo copyo ofo thiso ordero ando ifo foundo eligibleo ando meritorious,ohisonameobeorecommendedoforoappointmento tootheopostoAuctionoRecorderobyoHSSCotootheoconcernedo departmento ando appointmento lettero beo issuedo too himo forthwith.o o Needlesso too sayo thato theo petitionero willo beo entitledoforoallonotionalobenefits.ooo o PetitioneroNo.2-Amitoisoheldoineligibleoinotheoabsenceoofo detailedomarkosheetsoestablishingothatoheodidohisoB.Como withovocationalocourse.ooo CWPo No.23047o Disposedoof.ooRespondentsoareodirectedotooreconsiderotheo ofo2018o qualificationoofopetitionerobyoobtainingoanoexpertoopiniono CWPoNo.o22948oofo2018o(O&M)o o -15-oooo2023:PHHC:081289o o (Registrar,oMDUoasohasobeenodoneoinoCWPoNo.o13609oofo 2020)owithoregardotooequivalenceoofosubjectsostudiedobyo himoinoB.Techo(Electricalo&oElectronicsoEngineering)oaso welloasotheoDiplomaodoneobyohimoinoInstrumentationo&o ControloEngineeringofromoSethoJaioParkashoPolytechnic,o Damlao(YamunaoNagar)oissuedobyoHaryanaoStateoBoardoofo TechnicaloEducationowithosixomonthsocourseoinocomputero withino ao periodo ofo twoo weekso fromo receipto ofo certifiedo copyoofothisoorderoandoifofoundoeligibleoandomeritorious,o hiso nameo beo recommendedo foro appointmento tootheoposto AuctionoRecorderobyoHSSCotootheoconcernedodepartmento ando appointmento lettero beo issuedo too himo forthwith.oo Needlessotoosayothatotheopetitionerowillobeoentitledoforoallo notionalobenefits.o CWPo No.20841o Dismissed.o ofo2018o CWPo No.27292o Dismissed.o o Detailedo marksheetso depictingo subjectso ofo2018o studiedonotoattached.o CWPo No.21908o Disposedoof.ooRespondentsoareodirectedotooreconsiderotheo ofo2018o qualificationoofopetitionerobyoobtainingoanoexpertoopiniono withoregardotooequivalenceoofosubjectsostudiedobyohimoino B.E.o(Electronico&oCommunicationoEngineering)owithosixo monthsocourseoinocomputerowithinoaoperiodoofotwooweekso fromoreceiptoofocertifiedocopyoofothisoorderoandoifofoundo eligibleoandomeritorious,ohisonameobeorecommendationoforo appointmento too theo posto Mandio Supervisor-cum-Feeo Collectoro byo HSSCo too theo concernedo departmento ando appointmentoletterobeoissuedotoohimoforthwith.ooNeedlesso toosayothatotheopetitionerowillobeoentitledoforoallonotionalo benefits.o CWPo No.32398o Disposedoof.ooRespondentsoareodirectedotooreconsiderotheo ofo2018o qualificationoofopetitionerobyoobtainingoanoexpertoopiniono withoregardotooequivalenceoofosubjectsostudiedobyohimoino B.Como (vocationalo course)o witho sixo monthso courseo ino computerowithinoaoperiodoofotwooweeksofromoreceiptoofo certifiedo copyo ofo thiso ordero ando ifo foundo eligibleo ando meritorious,o hiso nameo beo recommendationo foro appointmento too theo posto Mandio Supervisor-cum-Feeo Collectoro byo HSSCo too theo concernedo departmento ando appointmentoletterobeoissuedotoohimoforthwith.ooNeedlesso toosayothatotheopetitionerowillobeoentitledoforoallonotionalo benefits.o CWPo No.24062o Disposedoof.ooRespondentsoareodirectedotooreconsiderotheo ofo2018o qualificationoofopetitionerobyoobtainingoanoexpertoopiniono withoregardotooequivalenceoofosubjectsostudiedobyohimoino B.Como (vocationalo course)o witho sixo monthso courseo ino computerowithinoaoperiodoofotwooweeksofromoreceiptoofo certifiedo copyo ofo thiso ordero ando ifo foundo eligibleo ando meritorious,o hiso nameo beo recommendationo foro appointmento too theo posto ofo Mandio Supervisor-cum-Feeo Collectoro byo HSSCo too theo concernedo departmento ando CWPoNo.o22948oofo2018o(O&M)o o -16-oooo2023:PHHC:081289o o appointmentoletterobeoissuedotooheroforthwith.ooNeedlessotoo sayo thato theo petitionero willo beo entitledo foro allo notionalo benefits.o o o o o o o o o o o (JAISHREEoTHAKUR)o o o o o o o o o JUDGEo Juneo02,o2023o Pankaj*o o o o Whetherospeaking/reasonedoo Yes/Noo o o o Whetheroreportableoo o Yes/Noo