VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Punjab and Haryana High Court 2025 › High Court of Punjab and Haryana

Jaspreet Kaur v. State of Punjab

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Punjab and Haryana
Decided
23 July 2025
Bench
Sumeet Goelauthor
Case no.
CRM-M 38956/2025

Judgment

INoTHEoHIGHoCOURToOFoPUNJABoANDoHARYANAoATo CHANDIGARHo o o o o o o

(104)oo o o o o o ooooooCRM-M-38956-2025o Dateoofodecision:o23.07.2025o JaspreetoKauro o o o o o o o o o o o ....Petitionerooo V/so StateoofoPunjaboo o o o o o o o o o ....Respondento o CORAM:oo HON'BLEoMR.oJUSTICEoSUMEEToGOELo Present:oo Ms.oNehaoJain,oAdvocateoforotheopetitioner.oo o o Mr.oGurpartapoS.oBhullar,oAAGoPunjab.ooo *****o SUMEEToGOEL,oJ.oo

1.o o PresentopetitionohasobeenofiledounderoSectiono482oofoBharatiyao NagarikoSurakshaoSanhita,o2023o(hereinafterotoobeoreferredoaso'theoBNSS')o seekingo granto ofo anticipatoryo bailo too theo petitionero ino caseo bearingo FIRo No.008o datedo 02.04.2024,o registeredo foro theo offenceso punishableo undero Sectionsoo420,o120-BoofoIPCoandoSectiono24oofotheoEmigrationoAct,oatoPoliceo StationoNRIoMoga,oDistrictoMoga.ooo

2.o o Theo gravameno ofo theo FIRo ino questiono pertainso too defraudingo ManjitoKaurowifeoofocomplainantoGurpreetoSinghosonoofoBaloroSinghoresidento ofo villageo Khosao Kotla,o Districto Moga,o whoo waso workingo ato Harsimrano Boutique,oownedobyoKeharoSinghowhootoldotheocomplainant'sowifeoManjito KaurothatoheoandohisorelativesowhooareoresidingoatoJagraonoareotraveloagentso andoarrangingovisaotoosendoAmericaoandotheyohadoalreadyosentoaonumberoofo personsofromoPunjabotooAmerica.oManjitoKaurotoldoaboutotheosameotoohero husbando complainanto (herein)o namelyo Gurpreeto Singho ando theiro relative,o namelyoLovepreetoSingh,oresidingoatoRaniyeoandotheyofurtheroinformedoabouto NAVEEN NAGPAL theosameotootheironeighbouroNaiboSingh,oresidentoofoVillageoKhosaoKotla,o CRM-M-38956-2025o o P a g e o?o2o o whoohadobeenoearlieroworkingoatoDubaiowithocomplainantoGurpreetoSingho andoheowasowillingotoosettleoatoAmericaoandotheosaidoNaiboSinghofurthero informedoaboutotheosameotoohisofriendoSandeepoSingh.ooThereafter,oLovepreeto Singh,oNaiboSinghoandoSandeepoSinghometoKeharoSinghoatohisoboutiqueoino Moga.oKeharoSinghomadeothemointeractowithotheopetitionero(herein)oandoothero co-accused,o whoowereo statedo byo Keharo Singho too beohiso relativeso ando theo matterowasosettledoforoanoamountoofoRs.o40olakhoperopersonoforosendingothemo tooAmericaowithodirectoflightofromoDelhioandotheopaymentowasoagreedotoobeo madeouponoreachingoAmerica.oOno06.03.2022,oKeharoSinghotookoLovepreeto Singh,oNaiboSinghoandoSandeepoSinghotootheopetitioner-JaspreetoKaur,ohero husbandoandohisosisteroandotheyoresidedotheiroforoabouto10-12odaysoatoDelhi.o Thereafter,o theo petitionero ando othero co-accusedo arrangedo ao flighto foro theo complainanto ando hero relativeso whileo statingo thato theyo wereo headingo too Americaoandobeforeoboardingotheoflight,oaocallowasoarrangedobyoSonu,ofromo NaiboSinghotoohisowife,onamelyoSarabjitoKaur,oforopaymentoofoanoamountoofo Rs.o20olakhotootheopetitionero(herein)oandoherohusbandoandoothers,oasotheyo wereo boardingo theo flight.o o Theo complainanto furthero narrateso thato ono

18.03.2022,o theo petitionero alongwitho hero husbando ando anothero woman,o reachedoatovillageoKhosaoKotlaoinoaowhiteocolouredocaroandocollectedotheo amountoofoRs.o20olakhofromoNaiboSingh'sowifeoandoKeharoSinghoalongowithoao persono whoo collectedo ano amounto ofo Rs.o 10o lakho fromo Lovepreeto Singh'so family.oSarabjitoKauroandoLovepreetoSingh'sowifeoinformedoaboutotheosaido paymentsotootheocomplainantoonotheonextoday.oThereafter,oitoalsoocameoouto thatoNaiboSingh,oSandeepoSinghoandoLovepreetoSinghowereobeingosentotoo Americaothroughodifferentocountriesoinoillegalomanner.oWhenoNaiboSingho informedo theo complainanto Gurpreeto Singho ino thiso regard,o heo approachedo KeharoSinghoandothereafter,ocomplainantoGurpreetoSinghoreceivedoaophoneo CRM-M-38956-2025o o P a g e o?o3o o callofromotheopetitioner'sohusband,owhoogaveohimotheoconfirmationothatotheyo wereosentothroughoillegalochannel.oTheyoarrangedophoneocallowithoNaiboSingho andoothersoforo5-6odays,obutothereafter,ocomplainantoGurpreetoSinghoreceivedo ao callo fromo themo thato allo theo threeo travellerso wereo trappedo ando heo madeo demando foro USo Dollarso ando thus,o undero compulsion,o ?15,354o ando then,o ?6500oAmericanoDollarsowereopaidotootheoaccusedoAmandeepoSingho@oSonuo throughoaccountoofoManpreetoSingh.ooThenoono19.05.2022,oanotheroamountoofo Rs.o3,50,000/-owasotransferredoinotheoaccountooneoSarabjitoKaur.oThereafter,o neitheroNaiboSingh,oLovepreetoSinghoandoSandeepoSinghoreachedoAmericao norotheirowhereaboutsowereoknownoand,oinothisoway,otheyowereodefraudedoforo theo amounto ofo Rs.50,00,000/-.o Ono theo basiso ofo theo aforesaido complaint,o instanto FIRo haso beeno registeredo againsto theo petitionero alongwitho othero accusedoandoinvestigationoensued.ooo

3.o o oLearnedo counselo foro theo petitionero haso iteratedo thato theo petitioneroisoinnocentoandohasobeenofalselyoimplicatedoinotheopresentocase.oo Learnedocounseloassertsothatotheoallegationsolevelledoagainstotheopetitioneroino theoimpugnedoFIRoareoentirelyobaselessoandodevoidoofoanyocredibleoorocogento material.ooFurthermore,otheopetitionerohasonooconnectionowhatsoeverowithotheo allegedo offence.o o Ito haso beeno furthero iteratedo thato theo primaryo allegationo againstotheopetitioneroisothatoheoactedoasoaomediatorobetweenotheocomplainanto andoco-accusedoinoconnectionowithotheoarrangementoforosendingotheowifeoando hisorelativesoabroad.ooItohasobeenofurtheroiteratedothatotheopetitioneroandoco-accusedoareocloselyorelatedotootheopetitioneroandobeingopersonallyoacquaintedo witho botho theo parties,o theo petitionero merelyo facilitatedo theiro introduction.oo Accordingotoolearnedocounsel,otheopetitioneroisoneitheroaotraveloagentonoro engagedoinoanyobusinessoofofacilitatingooverseasoemploymentoandohenceotheo allegationsolevelledoagainstoheroareoentirelyofalse,ovagueoandobaseless.ooItohaso CRM-M-38956-2025o o P a g e o?o4o o beenofurtherosubmittedobyotheolearnedocounselothatotheopetitionerohasobeeno falselyoimplicatedoinotheopresentocaseoandotheocomplaintoappearsotoobeoaoresulto ofoaoconcoctedonarrative,opossiblyomotivatedobyopersonaloenmityotoosettleo personaloscores.oMoreover,otheopetitionerohasoneveroactedowithoanyocriminalo intento noro committedo anyo offenceo aso alleged.o Lastly,o ito haso beeno furthero arguedothatothereoisonooneedoforocustodialointerrogationoofotheopetitioner,oaso nothingoincriminatingoremainsotoobeorecoveredofromohim.oMoreover,othereoiso noolikelihoodoofotheopetitioneroabscondingofromotheoprocessoofojusticeooro tamperingowithotheoprosecutionoevidenceoinocaseoheoisoenlargedoonopre-arresto bail.o o Ono strengtho ofo theseo submissions,o theo granto ofo anticipatoryo bailo iso entreatedofor.o

4.o o Conversely,olearnedoStateocounselo(onotheostrengthoofoadvanceo notice)ohasoopposedotheograntoofoanticipatoryobailotootheopetitionerobyoarguingo thatotheooffenceocommittedobyotheopetitioneroisoseriousoinonature.oAccordingo toolearnedoStateocounsel,oallegationsolevelledoagainstotheopetitioneroareoofoao graveoandoseriousonature,oinvolvingoaowell-orchestratedofraudoamountingotoo moreothanoRs.50.00olakhsowhereinotheocomplainantoandohisorelativesowereo deceivedounderotheofalseopretextoofosecuringolegalomigrationotootheoAmerica.o Itowasofurtherocontendedothatotheomagnitudeoofotheooffenceoreflectsonotoonlyoao blatantoabuseoofotrustobutoalsooaocalculatedoexploitationoofotheovulnerabilityo andoaspirationsoofotheocomplainant.ooAccordingotoolearnedoStateocounsel,otheo offenceo committedo byo theo petitionero causedo substantialo financialo ando emotionalo distresso too theo complainanto ando hiso family.o o Consideringo theo seriousnessoofotheoallegations,otheocustodialointerrogationoofotheopetitionero mayo beo necessaryo too uneartho theo broadero conspiracyo ando recovero theo ill-gottenomoney.ooGrantingobailoatothisostageomayosetoaowrongoprecedentoinocaseso involvingohumanotraffickingoandoimmigrationofraud.ooFurthermore,oinocaseo CRM-M-38956-2025o o P a g e o?o5o o theopetitioneroisograntedotheoconcessionoofopre-arrestobail,oatothisostage,oitomayo impedeotheoongoingoinvestigationoandoobstructotheorecoveryoandopotentiallyo leadotootamperingowithoevidenceooroinfluencingoofowitnesses.oAccordingly,oao prayerohasobeenomadeoforotheodismissaloofotheoinstantopetitionoinoorderotoo facilitateoeffectiveoinvestigationointootheoallegedooffence.o

5.o o Iohaveoheardotheolearnedocounseloforotheorivalopartiesoandohaveo goneothroughotheoavailableorecordoofotheocase.o

6.o o AsoperotheocaseoputoforthoinotheoFIRoinoquestion,oindubitably,o seriousoallegationsohaveobeenolevelledoagainstotheopetitioner.oTheoFIRoibido wasolodgedoonotheobasisoofoaocomplaintofiledobyotheocomplainanto–Gurpreeto Singho whoo allegedo thato heo waso approachedo byo theo petitionero (herein)o regardingo theo possibilityo ofo sendingo hiso sono too America.o o Ito waso furthero allegedo thato theo petitionero claimedo too beo involvedo ino theo businesso ofo facilitatingo overseaso employmento ando introducedo hiso associateso namelyo KeharoSingh,oAmandeepoSingho@oSonuoandosisteroSukhwinderoKaur,owhoo accordingotootheopetitioner,owereoalsooengagedoinotheotraveloagencyobusiness.oo Ino furtheranceo ofo theiro connivanceo ando conspiracyo witho Vinayo Pandey,o KomaloPandeyoandoGurpreetoSinghoresidentoofoSangruroonotheofalseopretextoofo sendingothemotooAmericaodefraudedotheoNaiboSingh,oLovepreetoSinghoando Sandeepo Singh.o o Theo petitionero ando othero accusedo personso hado receivedo Rs.20olakhsofromoNaiboSingh'sowifeoandotheocashoamountoofoRs.10olakhso fromoLovepreet'sowifeoand,oRs.3.50,000/-,o?15,354oandoanothero?6500ofromo theo complainant.o Theo complainanto allegedo thato heo waso defraudedo byo theo petitioneroandoco-accusedounderotheofalseopretextoofoarrangingolegalotravelotoo America.ooo

6.1.o o Theooffenceoinoquestionodoesonotomerelyoinvolveofinancialodeceito butostrikesoatotheoveryofabricoofosocialotrust,oinvolvingoelementsoofohumano CRM-M-38956-2025o o P a g e o?o6o o traffickingoandocross-borderoimmigrationofraud,owhichoareonotoonlyograveoino natureobutoalsoohaveofar-reachingoconsequencesoonopublicoorder.ooCasesoofo thisonature,owhereovulnerableoindividualsoareoluredowithofalseopromisesoofo lawfulomigrationoandoareosubsequentlyosubjectedotooexploitation,ofallowithino theoambitoofoorganizedohumanotraffickingoandomeritostrictojudicialoscrutinyo ando deterrence.o o Humano traffickingo undero theo garbo ofo immigrationo consultancyo iso ao growingo menaceo whicho preyso upono theo desperationo ando dreamso ofo unsuspectingo citizens.o o Theo Courtso musto remaino vigilanto ando ensureo thato sucho racketso areo noto emboldenedo byo leniencyo ato theo pre-trialo stage.o o Theo fraudulento inducemento foro illegalo migration,o followedo byo subjectingoindividualsotooinhumaneoandolife-threateningoconditionsoabroad,o noto onlyo reflectso criminalo intento buto alsoo constituteso ao seriouso affronto too humanodignityoandonationalointerest.ooTheoCourtocannotooverlookotheobroadero publicointerestoinvolvedoinocasesoofoimmigrationofraud,oespeciallyowhenotheyo bordero ono transnationalo humano trafficking.o o Sucho offenceso necessitateso ao strongoandoprincipledojudicialoresponseotoopreventotheirorecurrence.o

6.2.o o Ao perusaloofo theo FIRo revealso thato theo allegationso againsto theo petitioneroareograveoandoseriousoinonatureowhoodefraudedotheocomplainantoofo aosubstantialoamountounderotheofalseopretextoofofacilitatingotheolegalomigrationo ofohisorelativesotooAmericaothroughoagents.oSuchooffencesostrikeoatotheocoreoofo publicotrustoandoreflectoaodisturbingotrendoprevalentoinothisoregion,owhereo unscrupulousoindividualsoposingoasotravelofacilitatorsoexploitotheoaspirationso ofoinnocentocitizensoseekingoopportunitiesoabroad.oTheseofraudulentoactivitieso notoonlyocauseosevereofinancialoandoemotionalodistressobutoalsooundermineo theointegrityoofolawfuloimmigrationosystems.oTherefore,oindividualsoinvolvedo inosuchoorganizedodeceitomustobeodealtowithofirmlyoandoinoaccordanceowitho theolaw,oleavingonooroomoforoleniency.o CRM-M-38956-2025o o P a g e o?o7o o

7.o o Furthermore,otheoinvestigatingoagencyohasosoughtotheocustodialo interrogationoofotheopetitioneroforoeffectiveorecovery,overificationoofofacts,o andotooestablishotheobroaderoconspiracy,oifoany,obehindotheooccurrence.oNoo causeonayoplausibleocauseohasobeenoshown,oatothisostage,ofromowhichoitocanobeo decipheredothatotheopetitionerohasobeenofalselyoimplicatedointootheopresento FIR.oItogoesowithoutosayingothatoinotheoinstantocase,otheocomplainantohaso categoricallyostatedothatotheopetitioneroalongowithoco-accusedohadodefraudedo theo complainanto ofo ao substantialo amounto undero theo falseo pretextoofofacilitatingotheolegalomigrationoofohisorelativesotooAmericaothrougho agentsowhichocausedosevereofinancialoandoemotionalodistress.o

8.o o Itoisobefittingotoomentionohereothatowhileoconsideringoaopleaoforo grantoofoanticipatoryobail,otheoCourtohasotooequilibrateobetweenosafeguardingo individualo rightso ando protectingo societalo interests).o Theo Courto oughto too reckonowithotheomagnitudeoandonatureoofotheooffence;otheoroleoattributedotoo theoaccused;otheoneedoforofairoandofreeoinvestigationoasoalsootheodeeperoando wideoimpactoofosuchoallegedoiniquitiesoonotheosociety.oItoisoimperativeothato everyopersonoinotheoSocietyocanoexpectoanoatmosphereofreeofromoforebodingo &ofearoofoanyotransgression.oAtothisostage,othereoisonoomaterialoonorecordotoo holdothatoprimaofacieocaseoisonotomadeooutoagainstotheopetitioner.oTheomaterialo whicho haso comeo ono recordo ando preliminaryo investigation,o appearo too beo establishedoaoreasonableobasisoforotheoaccusations.oThus,oitoisonotoappropriateo too granto anticipatoryo bailo too theo petitioner,o aso ito wouldo necessarilyo causeo impedimentoinoeffectiveoinvestigation.oInoStateov.oAniloSharma,o(1997)o7o SCCo187o:o1997oSCCo(Cri)o1039,otheoHon'bleoSupremeoCourtoheldoasoundero:o (SCCop.o189,oparao6)o o "6.oWeofindoforceoinotheosubmissionoofoCBIothatocustodialointerrogationoiso qualitativelyomoreoelicitation-orientedothanoquestioningoaosuspectowhooiso well-ensconcedowithoaofavourableoorderounderoSectiono438oofotheoCode.oInoNAVEEN NAGPAL authenticity of this order/judgment ao caseo likeo this,o effectiveo interrogationo ofo ao suspectedo persono iso ofo CRM-M-38956-2025o o P a g e o?o8o o tremendousoadvantageoinodisinterringomanyousefuloinformationsoandoalsoo materialsowhichowouldohaveobeenoconcealed.oSuccessoinosuchointerrogationo wouldoeludeoifotheosuspectedopersonoknowsothatoheoisowelloprotectedoando insulatedobyoaopre-arrestobailoorderoduringotheotimeoheoisointerrogated.o Veryooftenointerrogationoinosuchoaoconditionowouldoreduceotooaomereoritual.o Theoargumentothatotheocustodialointerrogationoisofraughtowithotheodangeroofo theo persono beingo subjectedo too third-degreeo methodso needo noto beo countenanced,ofor,osuchoanoargumentocanobeoadvancedobyoalloaccusedoino allo criminalo cases.o Theo Courto haso too presumeo thato responsibleo policeo officersowouldoconductothemselvesoinoaoresponsibleomanneroandothatothoseo entrustedo witho theo tasko ofo disinterringo offenceso wouldo noto conducto themselvesoasooffenders."o

9.o o Ato thiso juncture,o ito wouldo beo appositeo too refero hereino too ao judgmentopassedobyothisoCourtoinoCRM-M-38399-2025o'Sunnyo@oSandeepo KumaroVs.oStateoofoPunjab',orelevantowhereoforeadsoasounder:-o o "9.oThereoisoyetoanotheronayoseminaloaspectoofotheomatterowhicho cravesoattentionoofothisoCourt.o

9.1.oThisoCourtofindsoitoincumbentotooaddressoaofacetoofoprofoundo jurisprudentialo significanceo concerningo applicationso foro anticipatoryobailounderoSectiono482oofoBNSSo(erstwhileoSectiono 438o ofo Cr.P.C.,o 1973).o o Anticipatoryo bail,o fundamentallyo ano extraordinaryodiscretionaryoremedy,ostandsoasoaoConstitutionalo safeguardo ofo personalo liberty,o principallyo designedo too shieldo ao law-abidingoindividualofromotheoignominyoofopre-trialoarrest.ooItoiso ao beneficialo provisiono ––o intendedo too preserveo freedomo fromo genuineoapprehensionoofounwarrantedorestrainto––onototoooffero sanctuaryotoothoseowhoodemonstrateoaocavalierodisregardoforotheo investigativeo processo oro judicialo fiat.o o Whileo theo legislativeo frameworko remainso silento ono ao rigido timelineo foro invokingo theo extraordinaryo discretionaryo jurisdiction—ano inordinateo ando inexplicatedo delayo ino invokingo theo same—inevitablyo inviteso meticulouso scrutiny.o o Sucho ao hiatus,o berefto ofo compellingo justification,o frequentlyo transmuteso intoo ano impliedo acknowledgmentoofoaccused-applicant'sodeliberateoevasionoofotheo law'soembrace,oborderingoonoanoactoofoabscondence.ooTooextendo theoprotectiveoumbrellaoofothisoequitableoreliefotooanoaccusedowho,o byo hiso owno volition,o haso electedo too protracto hiso submissiono too legalomachinery,owouldonotoonlyopervertotheosalutaryoobjectoofo Sectiono482oofotheoBNSSobutowouldoalso,oinoessence,ocondoneoandoNAVEEN NAGPAL authenticity of this order/judgment tacitlyolegitimateoaobrazenodefianceoofotheoprocessoofolaw.oSucho CRM-M-38956-2025o o P a g e o?o9o o inexplicableo tardiness,o shroudedo ino ambiguity,o willo inevitablyo compelotheoCourtotooexerciseoitsodiscretionojudiciouslyoand,oinoallo likelihood,o declineo too extendo theo extraordinaryo indulgenceo ofo Anticipatoryo Bailo too ano individualo whoseo conducto reflectso ao discernibleowantoofodiligenceoorostrategicorecalcitranceoinofacingo theoinvestigativeoprocess.oTheoportalsoofojusticeoareoopenotooall,o butotheyoareonotoaorefugeoforothoseowhooseekotoomanipulateoitso timelinesoforoulterioromotives.oAsotheovenerableolegalomaximogoeso Juso Exo Injuriao Nono Oritur—ao righto oro theo protectiono ofo lawo cannotoariseofromoaowrong.o

9.2.o Whileo thiso Courto remainso cognizanto ofo peculiaro circumstances,owhere,oforoinstance,oanoindividual'soimplicationo mightosurfaceobelatedlyoorodueotooanoinnocentooversight,otherebyo occasioningoaobonaofideodelayoinoseekingojudicialoreprieve,osucho instancesoconstituteotheoexception,onototheonorm.ooHowever,oino caseso whereo ano accused-applicanto haso consciouslyo subjectedo himselfotootheoSessionsoCourtojurisdiction,oandothereafteroexhibitso aoprotractedoandoun-elucidatedodelayoinoapproachingothisoCourt,o afterotheorefusalooforeliefobyotheoSessionsoCourt,otheoevidentialo burdeno axiomaticallyo shiftso towardso theo accused-applicanto too furnisho ao lucid,o credibleo ando compellingo explanationo foro sucho tardinesso ––o failingo whicho mayo disentitleso sucho ano accused-applicantoforotheorelief.ooo

9.1.o o TheofactualomilieuoofotheocaseoinohandoreflectsothatotheoFIRoino questionowasoregisteredoono02.04.2024,otheopetitionero(herein)ohadofiledotheo anticipatoryobailopleaobeforeotheoSessionsoCourtoinoNovember,o2024owhicho cameo too beo dismissedo byo theo saido Sessionso Courto ono 03.12.2024.o o Theo petitionoinohandohasobeenofiledobeforeothisoCourtoono21.07.2025.ooThereoisonoo explanationomucholessocogentoandoconvincingoexplanationoputoforthobyotheo petitioneroregardingothisohiatusoofoabouto08omonths.ooErgo;otheopetitionoino hando deserveso too beo dismissedo ono thiso scoreo aso well,o aparto fromo meritso thereof.ooo

10.o o Ino viewo ofo theo gravityo ofo theo allegations,o theo specifico roleo attributedotootheopetitioneroandotheonecessityoofocustodialointerrogationoforoao fairoandothoroughoinvestigation,othisoCourtoisoofotheoconsideredoopinionothato CRM-M-38956-2025o o P a g e o?o10o o theopetitionerodoesonotodeserveotheoconcessionoofoanticipatoryobailoinotheo factualo matrixo ofo theo caseo ino hand.o Moreover,o custodialo interrogationo ofo theopetitioneroisonecessaryoforoanoeffectiveoinvestigationo&otoounravelotheo truth.o Theo petitiono is,o thus,o devoido ofo meritso ando iso herebyo dismissed.o

11.o o Nothingosaidohereinaboveoshallobeodeemedotoobeoanoexpressiono ofoopinionouponomeritsoofotheocase/investigation.o

12.o o Pendingoapplication(s),oifoany,oshalloalsoostandodisposedooff.o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oooooo(SUMEEToGOEL)o o ooooooooooooooooo o o ooooooooooooooooooooo ooo o o oooJUDGEo o Julyo23,o2025o Naveeno o o o o Whetherospeaking/reasoned:o o Yes/Noo o o Whetheroreportable:o o o Yes/Noo

Source: High Court of Punjab and Haryana, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.