- Court
- High Court of Punjab and Haryana
- Decided
- 11 April 2023
- Bench
- Harsh Bunger
- Case no.
- CRM-M 51518/2022
Judgment
oo o 253o o INoTHEoHIGHoCOURToOFoPUNJABoANDoHARYANAoo AToCHANDIGARHo o ooCRM-M-51518-2022o(O&M)o DateoofoDecision:o11.04.2023o o o RAJNISHoVASUDEVAo oooooooooooo…Petitionero Versuso STATEoOFoPUNJABoANDoOTHERSo …Respondentso o CORAM:oo HON'BLEoMR.oJUSTICEoHARSHoBUNGERo o Presento:o Mr.oR.oC.oSharma,oAdvocateo o o forotheopetitioner.o o o HARSHoBUNGER,oJ.oo o o o Petitionerohasofiledotheopresentopetition,ounderoSectiono482oofo theoCodeoofoCriminaloProcedure,oforosettingoasideotheoimpugnedoorderodatedo
01.08.2022o(AnnexureoP-4),opassedobyolearnedoAdditionaloSessionsoJudge,o Kapurthalaoasowelloasoorderodatedo07.09.2016o(AnnexureoP-2)opassedobyo learnedo Judicialo Magistrateo Isto Class,o Kapurthala,o video which,o complainto No.6416o datedo 03.02.2012o (Annexureo P-1)o filedo byo theo petitionero undero Sectionso323,o324,o342,o349,o427,o452,o506,o148oando149oofotheoIndianoPenalo Codeo(45oofo1860)ohasobeenodismissedoquaorespondentsoNo.2otoo12.oo
2.o o Succinctly,otheopresentopetitionerofiledoaocomplaintobeforeotheo stCourto ofo Judicialo Magistrateo 1 o Class,o Kapurthala,o statingo thato theo complainantoandoaccusedoareoresidentsoofoHarnamoNagar,oKapurthala,owhereo theo complainanto iso runningo ao Charitableo Institutiono namelyo "Himanshuo VasudevaoHealthoSolution"oforotreatingotheoailingoandosickopeople,odueotoo whichothereowasoheavyorushoasotheoinstitutionostartoatoabouto8oti'oClockotillooooooooooooo 2023.05.09 18:54 1/11
oo o 5oO'oclockoinodifferentobatches.oItowasostatedothatoalthoughotheocomplainanto hadomadeoproperoarrangementoforotheosittingoofotheopersonsoinotheostreetobuto theoaccusedopersonsoalwaysotauntedotheopeopleoandoabusedotheocomplainant.o Itowasoallegedothatoono12.07.2011,otheoaccusedopersonsoalong-withocertaino GoondaoelementsoenteredotheoHealthoInstitutionoatoabouto3.30op.m.,oandoino theo absenceo ofo theo petitioner-complainant,o theyo startedo abusingo theo staffmembersoworkingooverothereoandotheocomplainant.oItowasostatedothatotheo fatheroofotheocomplainanto(agedoabouto95oyears)owasoresidingoonotheofirsto flooroofotheosaidobuildingandolateronotheoaccusedopersonsoalsooabusedoando pulledohisfatherofromobedoandodraggedohimouptootheostairsoandothreatenedotoo killohim.oItowasoallegedothatotheomaidoservantonamelyoRamoWantiowhoocameo outsideofromotheokitchenofromotheosecondofloororaisedohueoandocryoandotooko awayotheofatheroofotheocomplainantointootheoroomoandowhichosheolockedo fromoinside.oAllotheoaccusedostartedobeatingotheodooroandothenogaveodandao blowsoonotheodooroandoextendedothreats.oThenotheoaccusedopersonsoareostatedo toohaveocomeodownoandoinotheopresenceoofostaffomembersonamelyoSunilo Kumar,o Gurmito Kaur,o Amandeepo Kaur,o Manju,o Hena,o Chandra,o Sukha,o Manjuo Sharmao ando ino theo presenceo ofo publico startedo throwingo awayo machinesomeantoforotheotreatmentoofotheoailingopersons.oItowasoallegedothato theybrokeooneomachineowhileotheopublicothereosavedotheootheromachines.oIto isofurtheroallegedothatotheoaccusedoalong-withosticksoalsoocarriedoawayofiveo machinesoandowhileoleavingotheyothreatenedotheostaffomembersothatotheyowillo alsookillotheocomplainantoandoifotheostaffomembersoreportedothisomatterotootheo policeotheyowillofaceodireoconsequences.oItowasostatedoinotheocomplaintothato theomatterowasoreportedotootheopoliceohoweveronooactionowasotakenoandoono theocontrary,otheopoliceoofficialsowhooareoinoconnivanceowithotheoaccusedo 2023.05.09 18:54 2/11
oo o persons,ogotoregisteredofalseoFIRoagainstotheopetitioner-complainantoundero Sectionso452/34,o323/324oIPC.oAccordingly,otheopetitionerofiledoaocomplainto againstothemounderoSectionso323/324/342/379/427/452/o506/148/149oIPC.oo
3.o o Theopetitioneroexaminedohimselfoandootherowitnessesonamelyo Ramwati,oAmandeepoKumaroandoChandra,oinosupportoofoitsocase.oo
4.o o Theo trialo Courto aftero appreciatingo theo evidenceo ono record,o dismissedo theo complainto filedo byo theo petitionero video itso judgmento datedo
07.09.2016.o
5.o o Theo petitionero challengedo theo abovesaido judgmento datedo
07.09.2016obyofilingoaorevisionopetitionounderoSectiono397oCr.P.C.obeforeo theo Courto ofo Additionalo Sessionso Judge,o Kapurthala;o howevero theo saido revisionopetitionoalsoocameotoobeodismissedobyolearnedoAdditionaloSessionso Judge,oKapurthalaovideoitsojudgmentodatedo01.08.2022.oo
6.o o Now,otheopetitionerohasofiledotheoinstantopetitionounderoSectiono 482oCr.P.C.oimpugningotheoorderodatedo07.09.2016o(AnnexureoP-2)opassedo byo theo trialo Courto ando alsoo theo ordero datedo 01.08.2022o (Annexureo P-4)o passedobyolearnedoAdditionaloSessionsoJudge,oKapurthala.o
7.o o Iohaveoheardolearnedocounseloforotheopetitioneroandoperusedotheo paper-book.o
8.o o Hereo ito wouldo beo appropriateo too refero too fewo judicialo pronouncements.oo
9.o o Ino 'Mrinalo Daso &o otherso v.o Theo Stateo ofo Tripura,o 2011(9)o SCCo 479',o Hon'bleo Supremeo Court,o aftero lookingo intoo manyo earliero judgments,ohasolaidodownoparameters,oinowhichointerferenceocanoobeomadeoinoo o o 2023.05.09 18:54 3/11
oo o aojudgmentoofoacquittal,obyoobservingoasounder:oo o "Anoorderoofoacquittaloisotoobeointerferedowithoonlyo whenothereoareo"compellingoandosubstantialoreasons",o forodoingoso.oIfotheoorderoiso"clearlyounreasonable",oitoiso ao compellingo reasono foro interference.o Wheno theo trialo Courtohasoignoredotheoevidenceooromisreadotheomaterialo evidenceoorohasoignoredomaterialodocumentsolikeodyingo declaration/reportoofoballisticoexpertsoetc.,otheoappellateo courtoisocompetentotooreverseotheodecisionoofotheotrialo Courtodependingoonotheomaterialsoplaced."oo
10.o o InoStateoofoRajasthanov.oNaresho@oRamoNaresh,o2010(1)RCRo (Criminal)o128,oHon'bleoApexoCourtolaidodownothato"Anoorderoofoacquittalo shouldonotobeolightlyointerferedowithoevenoifotheocourtobelievesothatothereoiso someoevidenceopointingooutotheofingerotowardsotheoaccused..."oo
11.o o Ino'AllarakhaoK.oMansuriov.oStateoofoGujarat,o2002(1)oRCRo (Criminal)o748',oHon'bleoSupremeoCourtoheldothatowhere,oinoaocase,otwoo viewsoareopossible,otheooneowhichofavoursotheoaccused,ohasotoobeoadoptedobyo theoCourt.oo
12.o o Comingo too theo factso ofo thiso case,o theo trialo courto aftero appreciatingotheoevidenceoonorecord,odismissedotheocomplaintofiledobyotheo petitionerobyoobservingoasounder:o "4.o Iohaveoheardotheocontentionsoofold.ocounseloforotheo complainantoandohaveogoneothroughotheocaseofile.oTheo maino contentiono ofo theo complainanto iso thato allo theo accusedo ino connivanceo witho eacho othero committedo offenceo punishableo undero Sectionso 323/324/342/379/427/452/506/148/149o ofo Indiano Penalo Code.oHowever,ocomplainantohasoexaminedohimselfoaso CW1,o Ramwatio aso CW2,o Amandeepo Kumaro aso CW3,o Chandrao aso CW4o too proveo hiso assertion.o Perusalo ofo testimonyoofohisowitnessesoitohasocomeoonorecordothato 2023.05.09 18:54 4/11
oo o neithero complainanto noro hiso witnesseso haveo seeno theo accusedocausingoinjuriesoonotheopersonoofofatheroofotheo complainant.oTheoallegationsoofotheocomplainantoareothato ono 12.7.2011o ato abouto 3.30o p.mo accusedo abusedo ando pulledotheofatheroofotheocomplainantowhooiso95oyearsoofo ageoandoallotheoaccusedopulledohimodownofromobedoando draggedohimoupotootheostairsoandoalsoogaveothreatotookillo him.o However,o ito haso noto comeo ono recordo thato 11o accusedopulledotheofatheroofotheocomplainantofromotheo thirdo flooro ando whoo draggedo himo pulledo upo too stairs.o Moreover,oRamwatiowhooisoservantoofotheocomplainanto hasocategoricallyostatedoinoherostatementothatosheowaso workingoinotheokitchenowhenosheoheardonoiseofromotheo groundoflooroandosonoofoDwarkaocomeoupotoofirstoflooro andoorallyoabusedofatheroofocomplainantoandothrowohimo fromobed.oSheowasoworkingoinotheosecondoflooroandowheno sheoreachedotheospotofatheroofocomplainantowasoalreadyo lyingo ono theo flooro ando theno sheo layedo fathero ofo complainantoonotheobedoandolockedohimowhichoclearlyo showsothatosheohasonotowitnessedotheooccurrenceoasosheo wasoworkingoonosecondofloor.oSheoonlyoheardotheonoiseo andosheocomeodownoandosawofatheroofotheocomplainanto ono theo floor.o Sameo iso theo versiono ofo CW3o Amandeepo Kaurowhoowasoworkingoonotheogroundoflooroandohadonoto witnessedotheooccurrenceoonofirstofloor.oMoreover,ofathero ofocomplainantowasoofo95oyearsoofoageoatotheotimeoofo incidentoandofellofromotheobedocouldobeoononaturaloevento atotheoageoofo95oyears.oMoreover,othereoisonooparticularo injuryopleadedooroprovedoonotheopersonoofofatheroofotheo complainant.oThereoisonooavermentotootheoeffactothatoheo sustainedoanyoinjuryoatotheotimeoofodragging.oMoreover,o theo allegationo ofo draggingo too theo stairso iso selfo contradictoryo aso Ramwatio foundo fathero ofo theo complainantoonotheofloorooforoomonotonearotheostairs.o Thereoisonoomedicalorecordoofoanyoinjuryosustainedobyo 2023.05.09 18:54 5/11
oo o fatheroofotheocomplainant.oNoodocumentoofodoctor/MLRo hasocomeoonorecordonoroanyodoctorohasobeenoexaminedo tooproveotheosame.oFurtheroinjuredohasonotocomeoforwardo too proveo thiso version.o Neithero anyo reasono haso beeno mentionedobyotheocomplainantoforononoexaminationoofo thisokeyowitnessonoroanyodocumentohasocomeoonorecordo showingo theo complainanto inabilityo too examineo thiso witness.o Hence,o noo offenceo punishableo undero Sectionso 323oando324oIPCoisomadeoout.oo
5.o Asoperotheodiscussionoaboveoandotheostatementoofo Ramwatioservantoofocomplainantowhenosheoreachedoono firstofloorosheoherselfolockedofatheroofotheocomplainantoino theoroom.oHence,onoooffenceopunishableounderoSectiono 342oIPCoisomadeoout.oo
6.o Thereo iso noo primao facieo evidenceo ono recordo too showothatowhichoaccusedocriminallyointimidatedofatheroofo complainantonoroanyowordingoparticularohasocomeoono recordowhichowasousedoanyoofotheoaccusedotoothreateno theofatheroofotheocomplainantoorootheroemployeesoofotheo complainant.o Hence,o noo offenceo punishableo undero Sectiono506oIPCoisomadeoout.oo
7.o Thereoisoalsooallegationomadeobyocomplainantothato someo machineso wereo stolenobyotheo accused.o However,o complainantohasoprimaofacieofailedotooproveoonorecordo whicho particularo machineo waso stolen.o Thereo areo onlyo generalo allegationso thato someo machineso wereo brokeno andosomeowereostolen.oHowever,ocomplainantohasofailedo tooproveoonorecordohisoownershipoandopossessionoofotheo articlesoallegedotoobeostolen.oNooproofoofostolenoarticleso andototaloabsenceoofoanyodetailoaboutomachinesowhicho wereostolen.oHence,onoooffenceopunishableounderoSectiono 379oIPCoisomadeoout.oo
8.o Ino lighto ofo aboveo discussion,o complainanto haso failedotooproveothatoaccusedoenteredointootheopremisesoofo theo complainanto ando committedo anyo offence.o Ito iso 2023.05.09 18:54 6/11
oo o admittedocaseoofotheocomplainantothatoheoisorunningoao CharitableoInstitutionoinotheomemoryoofohisosonowhoowaso mysteriouslyomurdered,owhereoheoisotreatingotheoailingo ando sicko peopleo ando thiso serviceo providedo freeo too theo public.o Hence,o theo groundo flooro ofo theo houseo ofo theo complainanto waso openedo too public.o Eveno if,o accusedo wereopresentoonotheogroundofloorothenoitocannotobeoheldo thato theyo haveo trespassedo theo premiseso againsto theo wishesoofotheocomplainant,owhoohimselfohasoopenedotheo groundofloorotootheopublic.oHence,onoooffenceopunishableo underoSectiono452/148/149oIPCoisomadeoout.oo
9.o Moreover,o theo complainanto haso himselfo broughto ono recordo theo caseo FIRo No.110o ofo 23.6.2011,o undero Sectiono 452/323/324/506/427/34o IPC,o PSo City,o Kapurthala,o titledo aso "Stateo Vs.o Rajnisho Vasudevao &Anr."o decidedo ono 29.07.2016,o whicho clearlyo showso thatothereoisopreviousoenmityobetweenotheoparties.oTheo presentocomplaintoseemsotoobeocounteroblastoofosaidoFIRo lodgedoagainstohim…"o
13.o o Further,o theo Revisionalo Courto haso againo re-examinedo ando appreciatedotheoevidenceoonorecordoandodismissedotheorevisionopetitionofiledo byotheopetitionerovideojudgmentodatedo01.08.2022,obyoholdingoasounder:-o "…Theo recordo aftero hearingo theo argumentso haso beeno perusedoandoitoisofoundothatotheogroundsoofotheorevisiono asoperoversionoofotheorevisionist/ocomplainantoareothatoono
12.07.2011oatoabouto3:40oP.M.otheorespondents/oaccusedo hado enteredo intoo hiso charitableo instituteo runo byo himo undero theo nameo ando styleo aso "Himanshuo Vasudevao Healtho Soluction"o ando hado hurledo abuseso too staffo membersoworkingothere,hadodraggedoandothrashedotoohiso 95oyearsooldofather,ohadodamagedotheoproperty,ostoleno awayofiveomachinesoandothreatenedotheostaffomembersotoo faceo direo consequenceso ifo reportedo theo mattero too theo policeo ando theo staffo memberso hado movedo twoo 2023.05.09 18:54 7/11
oo o applicationsobeforeopoliceobutotoonooavail.oTheolearnedo counselo foro theo revisionist/complainanto haso arguedo aso perogroundsooforevisionothatotheoorderounderorevisionoiso wrongoinolawoandoisocontraryotootheofactsoofotheocaseoando theolearnedotrialocourtohasothusoerredoinonotosummoningo theorespondents/accusedowhenothereowasolotoofosaidooralo ando documentaryo evidenceo whicho haso provedo thato theo respondents/accusedo hado committedo offenceso undero sectionso323/324/342/379/o427/o452/506/148/149oofoIPCo andotheolearnedotrialocourtohadowronglyoheldothatonooanyo sucho offenceo waso committedo byo ignoringo sufficiento evidenceo broughto ono theo recordo byo theo revisionist/complainanto ando theo learnedo courto hado erroneouslyo disbelievedo theo evidenceo producedo byo theo revisionist/complainantoandohasovehementlyoarguedothato thereowasosufficientogroundoforoproceedingofurtherowitho theocomplaintoagainstotheorespondents/accusedobecauseo atothatostageotheolearnedotrialocourtohadotooseeoonlyothiso muchoasotoowhetheroanyoprima-facieocaseoforoissuanceoofo processoagainstotheorespondents/oaccusedowasomadeoouto oro not,o aso pero preliminaryo evidenceo ledo byo theo revisionist/complainantoonotheorecordothenobyoexaminingo himselfoandobyoexaminingomaterialowitnessesoandofromo theirotestimonyoitoisoclearothatoaoprima-facieocaseohaso beenomadeooutotooputotheorespondents/accusedoonotrialo ando lastlyo prayero haso beeno thato theo impugnedo order,o beingononspeakingoandocontraryotootheolaw,oisoliableotoo beosetoasideotooproceedoagainstotheorespondents/accusedo asoperoviewsotakenoinoShingaraoSinghoVs.oStateoofoPunjabo 2000(1)oRCR(Crl.)o123,oSmt.oRakeshoDevioVs.oStateoofo UPo2002o(2)oRCR(Crl.)o157,oLajwanito@oBimlaoVs.oStateo ofo Haryanao ando Otherso 2014(1)o RCRo (Crl.)o 929,o ando Sibuo Vs.o Mohindero Singho 2002(1)o RCRo (Crl.)o 165,o referredo byo theo learnedo counselo foro theo revisionist/complainantoinosupportoofotheosaidocaseoofotheo 2023.05.09 18:54 8/11
oo o revisionist/ocomplainant.oTheocontentionoofotheolearnedo counseloforotheorespondents/oaccusedoonotheootherohando iso thato noo anyo primao facieo caseo againsto theo respondents/accusedoisomadeooutofromotheofaceoofofactso andoevidenceoadducedoonorecordoandotheocomplaintowaso liableo too dismissedo ando waso rightlyo dismissedo ando ino termsoofowhich,otheorecordohasobeenoperusedoandoitoiso foundo thato noo anyo primao facieo caseo aso allegedo ino theo complainto byo theo revisionist/complainanto was/iso madeo outo againsto theo respondents/o accused,o aso observedo ino detailoinotheoimpugnedoorderotootheoeffectothatothereowaso nooanyoevidenceothatosomeoofohisomachinesowereostoleno byo theo respondents/accusedo ando theo revisionist/complainanto hado alsoo failedo too prima-facieo establishoasotoowhichosuchomachineohadobeenostolenobyo theo respondents/accusedo becauseo thereo wereo onlyo generaloallegationsothatosomeomachinesowereostolenoando someowereobrokenoandotheorevisionist/ocomplainantohado failedotooproveohisoownershipooveroallotheosaidoallegedo machinesoandoasoperoallegations,ohisooldoagedofatherowaso draggedo upo too stairso buto thereo iso noo anyo medicalo evidenceo ono theo recordo too establisho hiso sucho pleao becauseoifoao95oyearsooldomanowasomadeofallenofromotheo bedo ando waso alsoo draggedo foro someo distance,theno heo mustohadosufferedosomeoinjuriesoinotheoshapeoofoabrasiono oro scratcheso ando resultingo ofo which,o theo offenceo punishableounderosectiono379,323,324oofoIPCowasonoto madeooutoandotheogroundoflooroofotheopremisesoofotheo charitableoInstitutionorunobyotheorevisionist/complainanto foro treatingo theo publico ato largeo freeo ofo costo ino theo memoryoofohisosonomysteriouslyomurdered,owasoopenoforo publicobyo theorevisionist/complainanto ando theooffenceso punishableounderosectiono452/148/149oofoIPCowasonoto madeooutoandotheoFIRono.128oregisteredounderosectionso 325/34oofoIPCoinotheopoliceostationoCityoKapurthalaowaso 2023.05.09 18:54 9/11
oo o againstotheorevisionist/complainantoandoothersoandotheo sameoshowsothatotheocomplaintocaseowasocounteroblastoofo theosameoandootheroFIRono.110oregisteredounderosectionso 323/324/452/506/34o ofo IPCo alsoo ino theo policeo stationo Cityo Kapurthalao clearlyo showso thato revisionist/complainantowasonourishingogrudgeoagainsto theo accused/respondentso ando theo complainto waso noto tenableotooproceedoagainstotheorespondents/accused…"o
14.o o UponoconsideringotheofindingsoreturnedobyotheolearnedoCourtso belowo ono theo touchstoneo ofo theo legalo positiono aso indicatedo ino foregoingo paras,o Io doo noto findo anyo illegalityo oro infirmityo witho theo impugnedo judgment(s)/order(s),oapparentoonotheofaceoofotheosame,owhichomayocalloforo anyointerferenceobyothisoCourt.oNooevidenceohasobeenoledotooshowothatowhicho ofotheoparticularomachinesoofopetitioner-complainantowereostolen.oPetitioner-complainantohadofailedotooproveohisoownershipoquaotheoallegedomachines.o Further,onoomedicaloevidenceohasobeenoledotoosubstantiateothatotheooldoagedo fatheroofotheopetitioner-complainantowasodraggedouptoostairs.oStillofurther,oaso perotheoownocaseoofopetitioner-complainant,otheogroundoflooroofotheopremiseso ofopetitioner-complainantowasoopenotoopublicoandoevenoifotheorespondent-accusedowereopresentoonotheogroundofloorothenoitocannotobeoheldothatotheyo trespassedotheopremises.o
15.o o Theoimpugnedojudgment(s)/order(s)oareocertainlyonotoperverseo oro havingo beeno passedo ino violationo ofo settledo principleso ofo criminalo jurisprudence.oNooproceduraloirregularityooroillegalityohasobeenopointedoout.o Impugnedo judgment(s)/order(s)o areo basedo upono propero appraisalo ando appreciationoofoevidenceoandoasoperolaw.o
16.o o Therefore,othereoisonoomeritoinotheopresentopetitionoandotheosameoo o 2023.05.09 18:54 10/11
oo o isoaccordinglyodismissed.o
17.o o Allopendingoapplication/s,oifoany,oshallostandoclosed.o o o thAprilo11 ,o2023o o o o o o (HARSHoBUNGER)o gurpreeto o o o o o o o JUDGEo o Whetherospeaking/reasoned:o o o Yes/Noo Whetheroreportable:o o o o Yes/Noo o 2023.05.09 18:54 11/11
Source: High Court of Punjab and Haryana, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.