- Court
- High Court of Punjab and Haryana
- Decided
- 12 November 2025
- Bench
- Sumeet Goel
- Case no.
- CRR 1984/2025
Judgment
INoTHEoHIGHoCOURToOFoPUNJABoANDoHARYANAoATo CHANDIGARHo o o o 261o o o o o o CRRoNos.1973,o1979oo o o o o o o &o1984oofo2025o(O&M)o o o o o o o Dateoofodecision:o12.11.2025o IqbaloSainioo o o o o o o o o o o o ....Petitionero V/so M/soHarjeetoSinghoRaghuvanshoSinghoandoanotheroo o o o o o o o o o ....Respondentso o CORAM:oo HON'BLEoMR.oJUSTICEoSUMEEToGOELo Present:oo Mr.oDeepakoKumaroBartia,oAdvocateo forotheopetitioner(s).o o o Mr.oJarnailoSinghoSaneta,oAdvocateofororespondentoNo.1o o o o Mr.oDeepakoKumaroGrewal,oDAG,oHaryanao o o fororespondentoNo.2.o o o o o o *****o SUMEEToGOEL,oJ.o(Oral)o
1.o o Byothisocommonoorder,otheoaforesaidothreeorevisionopetitionsoi.e.o CRRoNos.1973,o1979o&o1984oofo2025,oareobeingodisposedooffotogether,oaso theosameoinvolveocommonalityoofofactsoandoissue(s).o o o Forotheosakeoofoconvenience,otheofactsoareobeingodrawnooutofromo CRR-1973-2025o(titledoasoIqbaloSainioVs.oM/soHarjeetoSinghoRaghuvansho Singhoandoanother).o
2.o o Theo presento criminalo revisiono petitionso haveo beeno filedo impugningotheojudgmentodatedo31.05.2025opassedobyotheolearnedoAdditionalo SessionsoJudge,oKurukshetrao&otheojudgmentoandoorderoofosentenceodatedo st07.08.2023/10.08.2023opassedobyoJudicialoMagistrateo1 oClass,oKurukshetrao wherebyotheopetitionerohasobeenoconvictedoandosentencedoforooffenceoundero NAVEEN NAGPAL Sectiono138oofoNegotiableoInstrumentsoAct,o1881.oo CRRoNos.1973,o1979o&o1984o(O&M)o o o o P a g e o?o2o o
3.o o Learnedocounseloforotheopetitionerohasosubmittedothatoduringotheo pendencyoofoproceedings,otheopetitioneroandotheocomplainantohaveoenteredo intooaosettlement/compromiseodatedo07.11.2025obeforeotheoMediationoando ConciliationoCentreoofothisoCourt.oLearnedocounseloforotheopetitionerohaso furthero submittedo thato sinceo theo partieso haveo amicablyo settledo theiro dispute(s),otheomatteromayobeocompoundedoandotheopetitionerobeoacquitted.ooo
4.o o LearnedocounseloappearingoforotheorespondentoNo.1ohasoratifiedo theofactumoofocompromise/settlementohavingobeenoarrivedoatobetweenotheo partieso ando haso furthero vouchedo theo genuinenesso ofo theo compromise/settlementodatedo07.11.2025ostatedotoobeoarrivedobetweenotheo partieso beforeo theo Mediationo ando Conciliationo Centreo ofo thiso Court.o Accordingly,o heo haso iteratedo thato theo respondent-complainanto haso noo objectiono ino caseo theo offenceo iso permittedo too beo compoundedo ando theo petitioneroisoorderedotoobeoacquitted.oo
5.o o Io haveo heardo learnedo counselo foro theo rivalo partieso ando haveo perusedotheoavailableorecord.oo
6.o o Itowouldobeoappositeotooreferohereinotooaojudgmentopassedobyo threeo Judgeo Bencho ofo theo Hon'bleo Supremeo Courto titledo aso Damodaro S.o Prabhuovs.oSayedoBabalaloH.,oAIRo2010(SC)o1907,orelevantowhereoforeadso thus:o o "15.o Witho regardo too theo progressiono ofo litigationo ino chequeo bouncingo cases,o theo learnedo Attorneyo Generalo haso urgedo thiso Courto too frameo guidelinesoforoaogradedoschemeoofoimposingocostsoonopartiesowhooundulyo delayocompoundingoofotheooffence.oItowasosubmittedothatotheorequiremento ofodepositoofotheocostsowilloactoasoaodeterrentoforodelayedocomposition,o sinceoatopresent,ofreeoandoeasyocompoundingoofooffencesoatoanyostage,o howeverobelated,ogivesoanoincentiveotootheodraweroofotheochequeotoodelayo settlingotheocasesoforoyears.oAnoapplicationoforocompoundingomadeoaftero severalo yearso noto onlyo resultso ino theo systemo beingo burdenedo buto theo complainanto iso alsoo deprivedo ofo effectiveo justice.o Ino viewo ofo thiso 2025.11.13 09:30 submission,oweodirectothatotheofollowingoguidelinesobeofollowed:-o CRRoNos.1973,o1979o&o1984o(O&M)o o o o P a g e o?o3o o o THEoGUIDELINESo o (i)oInotheocircumstances,oitoisoproposedoasofollows:o o (a)o Thato directionso cano beo giveno thato theo Writo ofo Summonso beo suitablyo modifiedo makingo ito clearo too theo accusedo thato heo couldo makeoanoapplicationoforocompoundingoofotheooffencesoatotheofirstooro secondohearingoofotheocaseoandothatoifosuchoanoapplicationoisomade,o compoundingomayobeoallowedobyotheocourtowithoutoimposingoanyo costsoonotheoaccused.o o (b)oIfotheoaccusedodoesonotomakeoanoapplicationoforocompoundingo aso aforesaid,o theno ifo ano applicationo foro compoundingo iso madeo beforeotheoMagistrateoatoaosubsequentostage,ocompoundingocanobeo allowedosubjectotootheoconditionothatotheoaccusedowillobeorequiredo toopayo10%oofotheochequeoamountotoobeodepositedoasoaoconditiono foro compoundingo witho theo Legalo Serviceso Authority,o oro sucho authorityoasotheoCourtodeemsofit.o o (c)oSimilarly,oifotheoapplicationoforocompoundingoisomadeobeforeo theoSessionsoCourtooroaoHighoCourtoinorevisionooroappeal,osucho compoundingomayobeoallowedoonotheoconditionothatotheoaccusedo payso15%oofotheochequeoamountobyowayoofocosts.o o (d)oFinally,oifotheoapplicationoforocompoundingoisomadeobeforeotheo SupremeoCourt,otheofigureowouldoincreaseotoo20%oofotheochequeo amount.o o Letoitoalsoobeoclarifiedothatoanyocostsoimposedoinoaccordanceowithotheseo guidelineso shouldo beo depositedo witho theo Legalo Serviceso Authorityo operatingoatotheoleveloofotheoCourtobeforeowhichocompoundingotakesoplace.o Foroinstance,oinocaseoofocompoundingoduringotheopendencyoofoproceedingso beforeoaoMagistrate'soCourtooroaoCourtoofoSessions,osuchocostsoshouldobeo depositedo witho theo Districto Legalo Serviceso Authority.o Likewise,o costso imposedoinoconnectionowithocompositionobeforeotheoHighoCourtoshouldobeo depositedowithotheoStateoLegaloServicesoAuthorityoandothoseoimposedoino connectiono witho compositiono beforeo theo Supremeo Courto shouldo beo depositedowithotheoNationaloLegaloServicesoAuthority.o o xxxo o o xxxo o o xxxo o o xxxo o xxxo o o xxxo o o xxxo o o xxxo o 17.oo Weoareoalsooconsciousoofotheoviewothatotheojudicialoendorsementoofo theo aboveo quotedo guidelineso couldo beo seeno asoano acto ofo judicialo law-makingoandothereforeoanointrusionointootheolegislativeodomain.oItomustobeo keptoinomindothatoSectiono147oofotheoActodoesonotocarryoanyoguidanceoono howotooproceedowithotheocompoundingoofooffencesounderotheoAct.oWeohaveo alreadyoexplainedothatotheoschemeocontemplatedounderoSectiono320oofotheo CrPCocannotobeofollowedoinotheostrictosense.oInoviewoofotheolegislativeo 2025.11.13 09:30 vacuum,oweoseeonoohurdleotootheoendorsementoofosomeosuggestionsowhicho CRRoNos.1973,o1979o&o1984o(O&M)o o o o P a g e o?o4o o haveo beeno designedo too discourageo litigantso fromo undulyo delayingo theo compositionoofotheooffenceoinocasesoinvolvingoSectiono138oofotheoAct.oTheo gradedoschemeoforoimposingocostsoisoaomeansotooencourageocompoundingo atoanoearlyostageoofolitigation.oInotheostatusoquo,ovaluableotimeoofotheoCourto isospentoonotheotrialoofotheseocasesoandotheopartiesoareonotoliableotoopayoanyo CourtofeeosinceotheoproceedingsoareogovernedobyotheoCodeoofoCriminalo Procedure,oevenothoughotheoimpactoofotheooffenceoisolargelyoconfinedotoo theoprivateoparties.oEvenothoughotheoimpositionoofocostsobyotheocompetento courtoisoaomatteroofodiscretion,otheoscaleoofocostsohasobeenosuggestedoinotheo interestoofouniformity.oTheocompetentoCourtocanoofocourseoreduceotheocostso witho regardo tootheo specifico factso ando circumstanceso ofo ao case,o whileo recordingoreasonsoinowritingoforosuchovariance.oBonaofideolitigantsoshouldo ofocourseocontestotheoproceedingsotootheirologicaloend.oEvenoinotheopast,o thisoCourtohasousedoitsopowerotoodoocompleteojusticeounderoArticleo142oofo theoConstitutionotooframeoguidelinesoinorelationotoosubject-matterowhereo thereowasoaolegislativeovacuum."o
6.1.o o FurtherotheoHon'bleoSupremeoCourtoinoaojudgmentotitledoasoM/so NewoWinoExporto&Anr.ovs.oA.oSubramaniamo2024oINSCo535o:o2024(3)o LawoHeraldo(SC)o2098,orelevantowhereoforeadsoasounder:o o "6.oo Ato thiso juncture,o weo wouldo alsoo likeo too reiterateo ao fewo wordso regardingotheoprinciplesoofocompoundingoofooffencesoinotheocontextoofoNIo Act.oItoisotoobeorememberedothatodishonouroofochequesoisoaoregulatoryo offenceowhichowasomadeoanooffenceoonlyoinoviewoofopublicointerestosoothato theoreliabilityoofotheseoinstrumentsocanobeoensured.oAolargeonumberoofo casesoinvolvingodishonouroofochequesoareopendingobeforeocourtsowhichoiso ao seriouso concerno foro ouro judicialo system.o Keepingo ino mindo thato theo 'compensatoryoaspect'ooforemedyoshallohaveopriorityooverotheo'punitiveo aspect',ocourtsoshouldoencourageocompoundingoofooffencesounderotheoNIo Actoifopartiesoareowillingotoodooso.o(See:oDamodaroS.oPrabhuov.oSayedo Babalalo H.o(2010)o 5o SCCo 663o (Parao 18),o Gimpexo Privateo Limitedo v.o Manojo Goelo(2022)o 11o SCCo 705o (Parao 29),o Meterso Ando Instrumentso PrivateoLimitedoAndoAnr.ov.oKanchanoMehtao(2018)o1oSCCo560(Parao
18.2)"o
6.2.o o Moreorecently,otheoHon'bleoSupremeoCourtoinoaojudgmentotiledo asoSanjabijoTariovs.oKishoreoS.oBorcaroandoanothero?o2025oINSCo1158,ohaso heldoasounder:o o "38.o Sinceo ao veryo largeo numbero ofo chequeo bouncingo caseso areo stillo I attest to the accuracy and pendingoandointerestoratesohaveofallenoinotheolastofewoyears,othisoCourtoiso CRRoNos.1973,o1979o&o1984o(O&M)o o o o P a g e o?o5o o ofo theo viewo thato ito iso timeo too 'revisito ando tweako theo guidelines'.o Accordingly,otheoaforesaidoguidelinesoofocompoundingoareomodifiedoaso under:-o o (a)o Ifo theo accusedo payso theo chequeo amounto beforeo recordingo ofo hiso evidenceo (namelyo defenceo evidence),o theno theo Trialo Courto mayo allowo compoundingoofotheooffenceowithoutoimposingoanyocostooropenaltyoonotheo accused.o o (b)o Ifo theo accusedo makeso theo paymento ofo theo chequeo amounto posto theo recordingoofohisoevidenceobutopriorotootheopronouncementoofojudgmentobyo theoTrialoCourt,otheoMagistrateomayoallowocompoundingoofotheooffenceoono paymentoofoadditionalo5%oofotheochequeoamountowithotheoLegaloServiceso AuthorityoorosuchootheroAuthorityoasotheoCourtodeemsofit.o o (c)oSimilarly,oifotheopaymentoofochequeoamountoisomadeobeforeotheoSessionso CourtooroaoHighoCourtoinoRevisionooroAppeal,osuchoCourtomayocompoundo theooffenceoonotheoconditionothatotheoaccusedopayso7.5%oofotheochequeo amountobyowayoofocosts.o o (d)oFinally,oifotheochequeoamountoisotenderedobeforeothisoCourt,otheofigureo wouldoincreaseotoo10%oofotheochequeoamount."o o o
6.3.o o TheostatutoryoprovisionoofoSectiono359oofoBNSS,o2023o(Sectiono 320oofoCr.P.C.,o1973)oandoSectiono147oofoNegotiableoInstrumentsoAct,o1881o whenoexaminedoalongwithoSectiono528oofoBNSS,o2023oinotheoguidingolighto ofotheojudgmentsoofotheoHon'bleoSupremeoCourtoinocasesoofoDamodaroS.o Prabhuo(supra),M/soNewoWinoExporto(supra)oandoSanjabijoTario(supra),o leadotootheounequivocaloconclusionothatotheooffenceounderoSectiono138oofo Negotiableo Instrumentso Act,o 1881o cano beo compoundedo ato allo stageso ofo litigation,o includingo wheno theo mattero haso reachedo theo Higho Courto aftero havingobeenoconclusivelyodealtowithobyotheoMagisterialoasoalsootheoSessionso Court.ooInootherowords,osuchoanooffenceocanobeocompromised/compoundedo evenoafterotheopetitioner-accusedohasobeenoconvictedobyotheoCourtoofolearnedo Magistrateo ando hiso appealo againsto theo sameo haso beeno dismissedo byo theo learnedoSessionsoCourt.ooo
6.4.o o TheoHon'bleoSupremeoCourtoinotheojudgmentoofoDamodaroS.o Prabhuo (supra)o haso alsoo enunciatedo that,o ordinarily,o costso oughto too beo CRRoNos.1973,o1979o&o1984o(O&M)o o o o P a g e o?o6o o imposedowhenotheooffenceounderoSectiono138oofoNegotiableoInstrumentsoActo ofo 1881o iso compoundedo ato ao stageo wheno substantialo proceedingso haveo alreadyobeenoundertakenobyotheoCourtsosooasotoodissuadeotheounscrupulouso litigantofromoundulyodelayingotheocompoundingoofosuchooffences.ooHowever,o discretiono haso beeno reservedo ino favouro ofo theo concernedo Courto too reduce/waiveo sucho costs,o ino caseo facts/circumstanceso ofo ao giveno caseo soo warrant.oTheoHon'bleoSupremeoCourtoinocaseoofoSanjabijoTario(supra)ohaso revisitedotheoguidelines,oinsofaroasoitorelatesotootheoquantumoofoimpositionoofo costso upono theo accused,o buto haso noto modifiedo theo leewayo grantedo ino theo judgmentoofoDamodaroS.oPrabhuo(supra)owhichopermitsoreductionoorowaivero ofocostsobasedoonotheofactualomilieuoofoaoparticularocaseoalbeitosubjectotootheo recordingooforeasonsoforosuchovariance.oForotheosakeoofoclarityoitoisoreiteratedo thatolibertyoreservedoinofavouroofotheocourtsotoowaiveotheoimpositionoofocostso mayobeoexercisedobyoanyoofotheocourtsoseizedoofotheomatter―beoitotheoHigho Court,otheoSessionsoCourtoorotheomagisterialoCourtoconductingotrial.oItois,o however,oimperativeotoobearoinomindothatodiscretionotoowaiveotheoimpositiono ofocostsoisonototoobeoinvokedoasoaomatteroofoordinaryocourse.oTheoexerciseoofo sucho discretiono musto beo predicatedo upono exceptional,o compellingo ando accentuatingo circumstanceso which,o ino theo consideredo opiniono ofo theo concernedoCourtoseizedoofotheomatter,owarrantodeviationofromotheogeneralo ruleoofoimpositionoofocost.oTheoCourt,owhileoinvokingosuchodiscretion,omusto recordoclear,ocogentoandoreasonedofindingsodelineatingotheospecialofactorso thato justifyo theo waiver.o Thiso requiremento iso ino consonanceo witho theo legislativeointentoandotheounderlyingopurposeosoughtotoobeoachievedobyotheo criminalizationoofotheoactoofodishonoroofocheque,oi.e.otooinculcateofinancialo disciplineoandoupholdotheocredibilityoandosanctityoofonegotiableoinstruments.o CRRoNos.1973,o1979o&o1984o(O&M)o o o o P a g e o?o7o o
6.5.o o Stillofurther,otheoinherentojurisdictionoofotheoHighoCourtoundero Sectiono528oBNSS,o2023isoprimarilyoaimedoatopreventingoabuseoofojudicialo processo ando securingo theo endso ofo justice.o Thus,o whereo theo disputeo iso essentiallyopersonaloinonatureoandoaogenuineocompromiseohasobeenoreached,o theo Higho Courto mayo interveneo too quasho theo conviction,o recognizingo thato continuedo proceedingso wouldo beo non-productiveo ando unjusto ino theo giveno circumstances.oTheoinherentopowersoofoaoHighoCourtoareoincidentalorepleteo powers,oinotheoabsenceoofowhich,otheoCourtowouldobeoobligedotoositostilloando helplesslyo witnesso theo processo ofo lawo beingo abusedo foro theo purposeso ofo injustice.o Ino othero words;o sucho power(s)o iso intrinsico too theo Higho Court,o formingoitsoveryolife-blood,oitsoveryoessence,oitsoimmanentoattribute.oWithouto suchopower(s),oaoHighoCourtowouldoretainoformobutolackosubstance.oTheseo powerso ofo ao Higho Courto henceo deserveo too beo construedo witho theo widesto possibleo amplitude.o Theseo inherento powerso areo ino consonanceo witho theo natureoofoaoHighoCourtowhichooughtotoobe,oandohasoinofactobeen,oinvestedo withopower(s)otoomaintainoitsoauthorityotoopreventotheoprocessoofolaw/Courtso fromobeingo obstructedo oro abused.o Ito iso ao triteopositoofo jurisprudenceo thato thougholawsoattemptotoodealowithoallocasesothatomayoarise,otheoinfiniteovarietyo ofo circumstanceso whicho shapeo eventso ando theo imperfectionso ofo languageo makeoitoimpossibleotoolayodownoprovisionsocapableoofogoverningoeveryocase,o whichoinofactoarises.oAoHighoCourtowhichoexistsoforotheofurtheranceoofojusticeo inoanoindefatigableomanner,oshouldotherefore,ohaveounfetteredopower(s)otoo dealowithosituationsowhich,othoughonotoexpresslyoprovidedoforobyotheolaw,o needotoobeodealtowith,otoopreventoinjusticeoorotheoabuseoofotheoprocessoofolawo andoCourts.oTheojuridicalobasisoofotheseoplenaryopower(s)oisotheoauthority;oino facto theo seminalo dutyo ando responsibilityo ofo ao Higho Court;o too uphold,o too protecto ando too fulfillo theo judicialo functiono ofo administeringo justice,o ino CRRoNos.1973,o1979o&o1984o(O&M)o o o o P a g e o?o8o o accordanceowitholaw,oinoaoregular,oorderlyoandoeffectiveomanner.oInoothero words;oSectiono528oofoBNSS,o2023oreflectsopeerlessoandoinherentopowers,oofo aoHighoCourtowhichomayobeoinvokedowheneveroitoisojustoandoequitableotoodoo so,o ino particularo too ensureo theo observanceo ofo theo dueo processo ofo law,o too preventovexationoorooppression,otoodoojusticeonayosubstantialojusticeobetweeno theopartiesoandotoosecureotheoendsoofojustice.oTherefore,otheoHighoCourt,oino theoexerciseoofoitsoinherentopowerounderosectiono528oBNSS,o2023ohasotheo discretionotooquashoaoconvictionowhereotheopartiesohaveoreachedoanoamicableo settlement,oprovidedothatosuchocompromiseoneitheroimpingeouponotheopublico interestonoroundermineotheocauseojustice,oasowelloasotheosubstantialojustice.o
7.o o Revertingotootheofactsoofotheocaseoinohand,oitoisonotodisputedobyo theoconcernedorivalopartiesothatoanoamicableosettlementohasobeenoarrivedoato betweenothemoand,otherefore,ocompoundingoofotheooffenceoandonecessaryo furthero directionso haveo beeno soughto fromo thiso Court.o o Ao perusalo ofo theo compromise/settlementodatedo07.11.2025ostatedotoobeoarrivedobetweenotheo partiesoreflectsothatotheopartiesohaveosoughtotooresolveotheirodispute(s)oinototoo andoburyotheohatchet.oConsequently,oinotheoconsideredoopinionoofothisoCourt,o theo factualo matrixo ofo theo caseo requireso thato theo offence(s)o oughto too beo permittedotoobeocompoundedoandotheopetitionerodeservesotoobeoacquitted.ooo
7.1.o o Keepingo ino viewo theo entiretyo ofo theo attendingo facts/circumstancesoofotheocase;oespeciallyofactumoofotheopetitionerohavingo sufferedo incarcerationo foro abouto 3o monthso &o 22o dayso aftero havingo beeno convictedobyotheoSessionsoCourt,otheopetitionerohavingofacedotheowrathoofo criminalolitigationosinceoaboutotheoyearo2018,otheopetitionerobeingoaopersono agedo47oyearsoofoageoandotheopetitionerobeingopleadedotoobeoaofirstotimeo offender;othisoCourtodoesonotodeemoitoappropriateotoosaddleotheopetitionero CRRoNos.1973,o1979o&o1984o(O&M)o o o o P a g e o?o9o o
8.o o Inoviewoofotheoprevenientoratiocination,oitoisoordainedothus:o
(i)o o Theo impugnedo judgmento datedo 31.05.2025o passedo byo theo learnedoAdditionaloSessionsoJudge,oKurukshetrao&otheojudgmentoandoordero stofosentenceodatedo07.08.2023/10.08.2023opassedobyoJudicialoMagistrateo1 o Class,oKurukshetraoareoset-asideoandotheopetitioneroisoacquitted.oo
(ii)o o Theo rivalo partieso shallo remaino boundo byo theo termso ofo theo settlement/compromiseodatedo07.11.2025oenteredointoobetweenotheopartieso beforeotheoMediationoandoConciliationoCenteroofothisoCourt.ooInocaseoofonon-complianceothereof,otheoaggrievedopartyoshallobeoatolibertyotooseekorecalloofo thisoorder,oalbeitouponoshowingosufficientocause.ooItoisoclarifiedothatoinocaseo non-complianceoisofoundotoobeoshown,otheoerringopartyomayobeosaddledowitho exemplaryopunitiveomeasure(s).ooo
(iii)o o Nooorderoasotoocosts.oo
(iv)oo o Pendingoapplication(s),oifoany,oshalloalsoostandsodisposedoof.oo
(v)oo o Photocopyoofothisoorderobeoplacedoonotheofileoofootheroconnectedo case(s).o o o o o o o o o o o oooooo(SUMEEToGOEL)o o o o o o o o o JUDGEo Novembero12,o2025o Naveeno o o o o o Whetherospeaking/reasoned:o o Yeso o o Whetheroreportable:o o o Yeso o
Source: High Court of Punjab and Haryana, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.