VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Tripura High Court 2024 › High Court of Tripura

Sri Tapas Das v. The State of Tripura and 4 Others

Dismissed
Court
High Court of Tripura
Decided
15 March 2024
Bench
T. Amarnath Goudauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 203/2024

Judgment

Order

This present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:-

"i. Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why Writ in the nature of mandamus and/or Order/direction shall not be issued whereby quashing and cancelling the Order, dated 04.07.2018, issued by the Additional Secretary to the Government of Tripura, General Administration (Personnel & Training) Department.

ii. Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why Writ in the nature of mandamus and/or Order/direction shall not be issued whereby quashing and cancelling the Orders, dated 01.10.2018 &

16.03.2019, both issued by the Deputy Secretary to the Government of Tripura, General Administration (Personnel & Training) Department.

iii. Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why Writ in the nature of mandamus and/or Order/direction shall not be issued whereby directing the Respondents to declare the Orders, dated

04.07.2018, 01.10.2018 & 16.03.2019 (infra) as "void ab initio" and "non est" in the eye of law, and thereafter, release all consequential financial benefits in favour of the Petitioner.

iv. Make the rules absolute.

v. Call for records pertaining to the instant Writ Petition.

vi. Pass any further order/orders as this Hon'ble High Court considered fit and proper."

Heard Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel along with Mr. K. Nath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. M. Debbarma, learned Addl. G.A. appearing for the State-respondents.

Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondents acted in an arbitrary manner and whimsically issued the suspension Order dated 04.07.2018, violating the relevant provisions of the CCS(CCA) Rules, 1965 and the same is liable to be quashed and set aside.

Heard and perused the evidence on record.

It is seen from the record that the impugned suspension order was passed by the Addl. Secretary to the Government of Tripura, GA(P&T) Department on 04.07.2018 itself but the same was not challenged by the petitioner for a long period of time. Now on

11.03.2024, by filing this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the same. As such, the present writ petition suffers from the principle of delay and laches for not approaching the Court in time. Accordingly, the same is liable to be dismissed on the grounds of delay and laches.

Further, the Disciplinary proceeding against the petitioner is still pending and any order that would be passed in this matter, this Court feels that it would have an impact on the Disciplinary proceeding.

Hence the present writ petition is dismissed. Stay if any stands vacated. Pending application(s), if any also stands closed.

JUDGE

suhanjit RAJKUMAR SUHANJIT SINGHA Date: 2024.03.18 16:40:52 +05'30'

Case details

Parties and counsel

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) NO.203 OF 2024 Sri Tapas Das Vs. The State of Tripura and ors. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD Present: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, Advocate. Mr. K. Nath, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. M. Debbarma, Addl. G.A. 15.03.2024

Source: High Court of Tripura, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.