- Court
- High Court of Tripura
- Decided
- 27 November 2024
- Bench
- T. Amarnath Goud
- Case no.
- LA.App. 103/2023
Judgment
ORDER
27.11.2024
Heard Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the appellants. Also heard Mr. B. Majumder, learned Dy. SGI appearing for the concerned party. [2]
Since, the subject matter involves in these appeals are similar in nature and the learned counsel appearing for both the parties are also same, thus these appeals are taken up collectively for hearing and disposal by a common order. [3]
Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the appellants in all the appeals submits before this court that before the Trial Court they have not placed any documents, proving the title and the same were not marked as exhibits also. [4]
Heard and perused the evidence on record.
[5]
It is seen from the orders passed by the learned Court below and also from the records that no issue has been framed with regard to the title deeds. Ownership have not been established and title deeds are not placed on record and thus there was no occasion to mark as exhibits. Without there being any issue on the titles and without examining the said documents, it cannot be construed that the claimants are the owners and they are entitled for compensation. In the absence of the same, this Court feels that the Court below needs to look into this aspect. Accordingly, the orders passed by the Court below are set aside, and the matters are remanded to the learned L.A Court for framing issues on the title deeds and providing an opportunity, if required, to amend the pleadings. The Court below is also directed to receive the title deeds, allow both sides to conduct chief and cross-examination, present arguments, and decide the matters as per procedure. With the above observation and direction, the appeals are remanded back and accordingly, the same are disposed of. As a sequel, miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
JUDGE
Paritosh
SABYA SACHI GHOSH by SABYASACHI GHOSH Date: 2024.12.06 12:02:53 +05'30'
Case details
Parties and counsel
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA LA. App No. 60 of 2024. Smt. Ramechu Chowdhury …………..Appellant(s) Vs Land Acquisition Collector & Anr. …………….Respondent(s) LA. App No.61 of 2024. Shri Gopal Debnath …………… Appellant(s) Vs Land Acquisition Collector & Anr. ……… Respondent(s) LA. App No. 63 of 2024. Shri Laxman Tripura ………..Appellant(s) Vs. Land Acquisition Collector & Anr. ……….Respondent(s) LA. App No. 102 of 2023 Shri Abir Sen ………..Appellant(s) Vs The Dy. Chief Engineer (Construction) N.F Railway & Anr. …………Respondent(s) LA.App No. 103 of 2023. Smt. Aditi Chanda (Das) ……..Appellant(s) Vs. The Dy. Chief Engineer (Construction) N.F Railway & Anr. …………Respondent(s) LA. App No. 104 of 2023. Smt. Pratima Roy ……..Appellant(s) Vs. The Dy. Chief Engineer (Construction) N.F Railway & Anr. …………Respondent(s) LA.App No.109 of 2023. Shri Biplab Baidya & Ors. ……..Appellant(s) Vs. The Dy. Chief Engineer (Construction) N.F Railway & Anr. …………Respondent(s) LA.App. No. 06 of 2024 Sri Rakhal Ch. Sen ……….Appellant(s) Vs. The Dy. Chief Engineer (Construction) N.F Railway & Anr. …………Respondent(s) LA.App No.07 of 2024 Sri Rakhal Ch. Sen ………Appellant (s) Vs. The Dy. Chief Engineer (Construction) N.F Railway Badharghat Railway Station & Anr. …………Respondent(s) LA.App No. 12 of 2024. Shri Kalayan Brata Basak ……..Appellant(s) Vs. The Dy. Chief Engineer (Construction) N.F Railway , Badharghat Railway Station and Anr. …………Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. B. Majumder, Dy. SGI. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
Source: High Court of Tripura, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.