Nasreen v. State of Uttarakhand

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar's order with Signatures COURT'S OR JUDGE'S ORDERS

ABA/91/2026 Nasreen --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent

Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Pawan Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants.

Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.

Mr. Abhishek Verma, learned counsel for the complainant.

¶2By means of present application, the applicants seek grant of anticipatory bail in connection with FIR/Case Crime No. of 2026, registered at Police Station Doiwala, District Dehradun, for offence punishable under Section 80(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶3A Coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 20.03.2026, granted interim to applicants. In compliance with conditions stipulated therein, applicants have duly cooperated with the investigation as and when called upon by the Investigating Officer.

¶4It has been brought to the notice of this Court that the investigation has since been concluded and the charge-sheet has already been submitted before the competent Court. Learned counsel for submits that pursuant to the interim protection granted by this Court, the applicants have cooperated throughout

the investigation and have not misused the liberty granted to them. It is further submitted that the investigation has culminated in the submission of the charge-sheet and, therefore, no custodial interrogation of is required at this stage.

¶5Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposes the application. However, he does not dispute that have cooperated during course of investigation and that the charge-sheet has already been filed before competent Court.

¶6Having heard learned counsel for parties, perused material available on record, and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court finds that the applicants have remained protected by virtue of the interim order dated 20.03.2026 and have duly complied with conditions incorporated therein by extending full cooperation during the course of the investigation. The investigation has culminated in the submission of the charge-sheet before competent Court. No material has been placed before this Court to indicate that the applicants have either misused the liberty granted to them or failed to cooperate with the investigating agency. It is also not the case of the prosecution that the custodial interrogation of the applicants is required at this stage.

¶7Having regard to the nature of the allegations, the stage of the proceedings, the conduct of the applicants during the period of interim protection, and the overall facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the prosecution case, this Court is of the considered opinion that the applicants have made

out a fit case for confirmation of the interim anticipatory bail granted vide order dated 20.03.2026.

¶8Consequently, interim granted to applicants vide order dated 20.03.2026 is hereby confirmed and made absolute. The shall remain on anticipatory bail on the same terms and conditions as contained in the aforesaid order and shall continue to cooperate with the trial proceedings. It shall also be open to the learned Trial Court to impose such further conditions, if considered necessary, in accordance with law.

¶9Accordingly, present Anticipatory Bail Application stands allowed.

(Alok Mahra, J.)

14-08-2026 SB

SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND,

2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24 b5aa08b09c12f21822fbd40bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542 D7FF0A9BED00E67B5283D205F18FE29BDF5DD 9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2026.08.17 10:39:29 +05'30'